Ring-fenced science budget under threat

V-cs fail to get David Willetts’ commitment to protect research spending

January 9, 2014

Source: Alamy

No guarantee: David Willetts would not say that the science budget was fixed

Ministers may soon start outlining cuts of up to £1.4 billion from higher education spending, potentially including the research budget, after Russell Group vice-chancellors failed to win a guarantee from David Willetts that science would continue to be protected.

The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills is expected to send the annual grant letter to the Higher Education Funding Council for England later this month, setting out funding for 2014-15.

BIS is struggling to recover from a £1.4 billion overspend, which mainly went on maintenance grants, stemming from the higher than expected number of poor students going to university, and also a failure to control spending on students at private providers.

One option discussed in the department late last year was to cut 2 per cent from the £4.6 billion research budget in 2014-15 – ring-fenced until now – and again in 2015-16, which would save about £215 million over the two years.

This option was detailed on 13 November in a written briefing for Mr Willetts, the universities and science minister, and Vince Cable, the business secretary, and press reports based on this leaked document have been entirely accurate, according to some in the sector.

After press reports on the budget shortfall, the government added to funding concerns for many in the sector by announcing, in Chancellor George Osborne’s Autumn Statement on 5 December, the abolition of student number controls.

Russell Group vice-chancellors, led by University College London provost Michael Arthur, tried to press Mr Willetts on research funding at a Universities UK meeting the day after the Autumn Statement.

According to one sector source, the meeting was “all about getting Willetts to make a commitment that the science budget was fixed – he didn’t”.

There is said to be a dispute within the coalition government as to how to make cuts, with Mr Willetts and Mr Osborne seeking to maintain the science ring-fence. The alternative option backed by Mr Willetts is reportedly to convert £1,000 a year from the £3,250 student maintenance grant into loans, saving about £350 million.

However, Mr Cable and Nick Clegg, the Liberal Democrat leader, are said to oppose that – a stance that would spell cuts to research.

Further cuts to widening participation funding are also a strong possibility. Some suggest that last year’s spending round commitment to save “at least £45 million” from Hefce teaching funding in 2015-16 could be brought forward to 2014-15 – likely to mean cuts to student opportunity funding, which is allocated to institutions on the basis of how many of the poorest students they teach.


Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

United Nations peace keeper

Understanding the unwritten rules of graduate study is vital if you want to get the most from your PhD supervision, say Kevin O'Gorman and Robert MacIntosh

David Parkins Christmas illustration (22 December 2016)

A Dickensian tale, set in today’s university

Eleanor Shakespeare illustration (5 January 2017)

Fixing problems in the academic job market by reducing the number of PhDs would homogenise the sector, argues Tom Cutterham

poi, circus

Kate Riegle van West had to battle to bring her circus life and her academic life together

Houses of Parliament, Westminster, government

There really is no need for the Higher Education and Research Bill, says Anne Sheppard