'Right to be forgotten' comes under attack

The Wikimedia Foundation has spoken out against “the right to be forgotten” enshrined in European law, likening it to removing an index from a book.

August 7, 2014

Wiki keys

The recent judgement by the European Court of Justice in the case Google Spain v. AEPD and Mario Costeja allows individuals to “de-index” content about themselves, including links to newspaper reports, if it is “inadequate, irrelevant or no longer relevant or excessive in the light of the time that had elapsed”.

The ruling has potential implications for academic research.

Speaking at a press briefing to launch the tenth Wikimania conference at London’s Barbican Centre this week, Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales argued that “the right to create content, including controversial content, should be accepted”.

Geoff Brigham, general counsel for the Wikimedia Foundation, the US-based organisation behind Wikipedia, was worried that “history is being filled with memory holes. Demands that we erase content are a direct threat to our mission.” Not only was “the right to be forgotten… a false promise”, but it meant that “links may be silently deleted”.

“This type of self-censorship is unacceptable,” added the foundation’s chief executive, Lila Tretikov, “the lack of disclosure inexcusable”. Deleting links amounted to “removing an index to a book in a library” rather than just “correcting the information in the book”, she said.

The press conference also saw the launch of the Wikimedia Foundation’s first Transparency Report, which sets out how it responds to requests to provide user information, to take down or alter content, or to remove material said to be in copyright.

Of the 304 “requests for content alteration and takedown” during the two years to June 2014, not a single one had been granted. Examples cited included a request by a French intelligence agency to remove information about a military base that became publicly available after it had arranged a visit for local journalists, and a complaint from a photographer who claimed copyright in some images created by a macaque monkey which had stolen his camera and taken several “selfies”.

matthew.reisz@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham