Rethink needed to avoid polarisation of sector, ministers told

Two proposals have been put forward to avert the “polarisation” of the sector as a result of the government’s student number plans.

December 7, 2011

In an open letter to coalition ministers, the University Alliance group of “business-engaged” institutions suggests allocating the 20,000 cut-price places that are being made available in 2012-13 more evenly so that they are not only open to those with average fees of £7,500 or below.

Instead, the group asks the government to consider either tapering the redistribution of places according to fee level or retaining some contestable places for universities charging above £7,500.

In the letter to David Willetts, the universities and science minister, and Vince Cable, the business secretary, Janet Beer, chair of University Alliance and vice-chancellor of Oxford Brookes University, says the current plans would cause a “false divide” in the market.

“We have serious concerns about rolling forward core and margin in its current form," she writes.

“Having carefully analysed these proposals, we believe that these mechanisms are in danger of restricting rather than expanding diversity and choice across the sector as well as having a detrimental impact on social mobility.”

Professor Beer says that while a small number of universities would be able to continue charging high fees, most mainstream universities are being forced under £7,500.

“There are many legitimate market positions between £9,000 and £7,500 and we believe that it is in the interests of students and the UK economy that some institutions are allowed to operate in this space,” she writes.

In the first Alliance proposal, the 20,000 places would be carved up and distributed in a more “gradual” way to those charging different fee levels.

The second idea suggests making a certain percentage of numbers available for redistribution above £7,500 and a certain percentage available below £7,500.

The letter also reiterates an Alliance view that funding chiefs should consider lowering the AAB A-level threshold – above which there is no limit on student places – in one “radical reduction” in 2014-15.

simon.baker@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (29 June 2017)

Academics who think they can do the work of professional staff better than professional staff themselves are not showing the kind of respect they expect from others

As the pay of BBC on-air talent is revealed, one academic comes clean about his salary

Senior academics at Teesside University put at risk of redundancy as summer break gets under way

Capsized woman and boat

Early career academics can be left to sink or swim when navigating the choppy waters of learning scholarly writing. Helen Sword says a more formal, communal approach can help everyone, especially women

Thorns and butterflies

Conditions that undermine the notion of scholarly vocation – relentless work, ubiquitous bureaucracy – can cause academics acute distress and spur them to quit, says Ruth Barcan