Public engagement means ‘sacrificing’ academic career

Perception that time should be spent improving research prowess

July 9, 2015
'Sacrifice' engraved on stone tablet

Academics who take to heart “the rhetoric of policy” and dedicate significant amounts of their time to public engagement are “virtually sacrificing [their] academic career”.

This is the view of 40 academics known for public engagement who were interviewed for a paper by Richard Watermeyer, associate professor in the sociology of education at the University of Warwick.

According to the paper, “Lost in the ‘third space’: the impact of public engagement in higher education on academic identity, research practice and career progression”, published last month in the European Journal of Higher Education, the “dominant prescription” is that academics should carry out public engagement because it is inherently “a good thing” and “reveals academics to be publicly interested, involved, responsive and transparent knowledge workers”.

However, respondents typically reported that their own public engagement was “inhibitive and deleterious to [their] research identities and careers” because career progression is “tied almost exclusively to” research prowess.

Senior managers’ estimations of public engagement “were felt to be near universally abject and characterized by declamations of [it] as parasitic”.

One manager said that colleagues saw public engagement as “academic profligacy” that should only be done outside contracted hours: “It is when eyes begin to roll – especially at a [vice-chancellor] level, [illustrating] a sense that, ‘we don’t want the enthusiasts to take over’.”

The potential for public engagement to take up research time is a particular peril for junior scholars, who can – as one respondent put it – “get brought into [public engagement] projects as cheap labour”.

Respondents dismissed the idea that the research excellence framework has improved matters, since public engagement is still seen as “a ‘soft’ and less easily measured version of ‘stakeholder’ engagement – the latter synonymous with knowledge translation, exploitation and commercialization”.

One interviewee said that a peer-reviewed assessment of public engagement could help raise its status: “I don’t know whether we want to go along that route but ultimately evaluation…results in credentials,” she said.

paul.jump@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

POSTSCRIPT:

Article originally published as: Abandon all hope, ye who engage the public (9 July 2015)

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham