Pfizer takeover bid: MPs write to Willetts to sound warnings

A committee of MPs has written to David Willetts over the potential risks to UK science of the proposed takeover of AstraZeneca by US giant Pfizer.

May 15, 2014

The House of Commons Science and Technology Committee says in the letter that the short-term assurances Pfizer has given the government about research and development capacity can be of “little value” as the pharmaceutical industry measures progress in “decades rather than years”.

The letter, signed by the committee’s chair, Labour MP Andrew Miller, says that the pharmaceutical industry is “vital” to UK science and accounts for around 25 per cent of all commercial research and development. It also employs 2,000 “highly skilled” British scientists.

“AstraZeneca forms an extremely important part of this landscape. As such, the national stake in the proposed transaction with Pfizer is unusually high: any threat to AstraZeneca’s research capacity must, to an extent, be considered a threat to UK science,” the letter says.

The MPs warn Mr Willetts, the universities and science minister, that the government “cannot ignore the risks”.

“Science is a long-term enterprise and it requires a genuinely long-term commitment. We are not yet convinced that this is what Pfizer is offering,” the letter says.

Pfizer has pledged to base 20 per cent of its research and development staff in the UK for five years in the event of a takeover.

But the chief executive of the company, Ian Read, admitted when grilled by the Commons Business, Innovation and Skills committee on 13 May that the research and development spend of any combined company would be reduced.

The MPs from the Science and Technology Committee say that Pfizer should “strengthen” and “lengthen” the promises it has made to the government. They add that the government must be willing and able to hold Pfizer to account if needed.

“We support the Government’s efforts to attract foreign investment, but this must not be at the expense of UK science,” the letter concludes.

holly.else@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (1)

Too little of UK State funded research in our universities seems to have translated across to industry and commerce. Moreover much of the latter appears not to have developed the necessary matching R&D capability, pharmaceuticals perhaps being an exception, hence presumably the current M&A concerns. Maybe more self supporting Research Institutes and Catapult centres combining successful university research teams and industrial collaborators will better drive QR/HEIF/RC basic research forward to commercialisation, so that we eventually have strong R&D in more sectors.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Assistant Recruitment - Human Resources Office

University Of Nottingham Ningbo China

Outreach Officer

Gsm London

Professorship in Geomatics

Norwegian University Of Science & Technology -ntnu

Professor of European History

Newcastle University

Head of Department

University Of Chichester
See all jobs

Most Commented

men in office with feet on desk. Vintage

Three-quarters of respondents are dissatisfied with the people running their institutions

A face made of numbers looks over a university campus

From personalising tuition to performance management, the use of data is increasingly driving how institutions operate

students use laptops

Researchers say students who use computers score half a grade lower than those who write notes

Canal houses, Amsterdam, Netherlands

All three of England’s for-profit universities owned in Netherlands

As the country succeeds in attracting even more students from overseas, a mixture of demographics, ‘soft power’ concerns and local politics help explain its policy