NUS president Toni Pearce challenges v-cs on public role

Vice-chancellors should take up more prominent public roles as forces for good in society, the National Union of Students president has said.

September 12, 2013

Speaking at Universities UK’s annual conference, Toni Pearce said university heads should be “on the breakfast television sofa” and taking part in public debates.

 “You should be on Question Time instead of Russell Brand and David Starkey – I mean seriously.”

Ms Pearce joked that she had 18 years of experience in education, while vice-chancellors collectively had “about 5,000”.

They should be “some of the most important intellectual leaders in society”, she said, noting that many university leaders had expertise in key areas such as public health, technology and poverty. “I urge you exploit your positions,” she added.

Ms Pearce appealed for vice-chancellors to speak out against the government’s lobbying bill, which would subject many organisations – including charities and unions – to a £390,000 cap on their campaign spending in the run-up to an election.

More generally, she urged them to take a “wider role in social and political debate. Great universities should not be ivory towers, but institutions of the people…I hope that you as university leaders will bring that mission to life.”

The conference, held at the University of Leicester, also heard from the new UUK president, Sir Christopher Snowden.

He warned that the spending review after the 2015 election will open “complicated discussions with government – and especially on the sustainability of the loan system”.

And he continued that universities must “argue for alternative funding models that might include different ways of structuring the student loan scheme and current funding systems, or making the case for increased investment, or indeed both”.

Speaking to reporters afterwards, Sir Christopher said the £9,000 fees system came about “with very little real engagement from the sector”, and was “imposed” by the government.

“We have to lead, not follow. Above all we must be clear about what we want,” he said in his speech.

Sir Christopher told reporters that changing loan repayment thresholds for graduates, or the 30-year write off period, or interest rates were options. “There are a whole number of issues that could be addressed here that have a significant impact on the viability of the scheme,” he added.

He sounded sceptical when asked about Labour’s policy to lower fees to £6,000 if the party was in power now, noting it would require “a significant level of direct funding to universities”. He added: “That would present a challenge for any government, realistically.”

Sir Christopher also warned that the £9,000 fee cap is being eroded by inflation (saying in his speech that it would be worth the equivalent of £8,250 by mid-2015), meaning that supporting the student experience would become “increasingly challenging”.

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham