Nobel Prize for Chemistry awarded for nanoscale microscopy work

The 2014 Nobel Prize for Chemistry has been shared by three scientists for their work on the development of nanoscale microscopy.

October 8, 2014

The award recognises two scientists from the US and one from Germany, who developed super-resolved fluorescence microscopy.

They are Eric Betzig of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute; Stefan Hell of the Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry and the German Cancer Research Center; and William Moerner, from Stanford University.

Their ground-breaking work allowed limitations of the light microscope to be overcome, giving scientists the ability to visualise the pathways of individual molecules inside cells.

The trio brought optical microscopy into the nanodimension, according to a statement from the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.

In 2000 Professor Hell developed a process known as stimulated emission depletion microscopy. This uses two lasers to scan a sample and gives higher resolution images than was previously possible.

Meanwhile, working separately, Dr Betzig and Professor Moerner laid the foundations for a second method, known as single-molecule microscopy, which creates a dense super-image of nanoscale resolution. This method was used for the first time in 2006.

Nanoscopy is now used globally to produce new knowledge that is of great benefit to mankind.

None of the winners has appeared on a list of predicted Nobel winners compiled each year by Thomson Reuters citation analyst David Pendlebury.

holly.else@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (1)

The work is terrific, of course. What I like about your report is that "None of the winners has appeared on a list of predicted Nobel winners compiled each year by Thomson Reuters citation analyst David Pendlebury". This seems to be yet another illustration of the folly of trying to assess science without either reading it or understanding it. Perhaps it will help universities to save money by not paying for Thomson Reuters's citations.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (29 June 2017)

Academics who think they can do the work of professional staff better than professional staff themselves are not showing the kind of respect they expect from others

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride

Sir Christopher Snowden, former Universities UK president, attacks ratings in wake of Southampton’s bronze award

Senior academics at Teesside University put at risk of redundancy as summer break gets under way

Tef, results, gold, silver, bronze, teaching excellence framework

The results of the 2017 teaching excellence framework in full. Find out which universities were awarded gold, silver or bronze