MPs investigate student finance

March 31, 2000

MPs could influence the government's inquiry into top-up fees and university funding with their own investigation of student finance.

The education and employment sub-committee announced this week that it is to hold special evidence sessions on student finance, heralding its forthcoming inquiry into higher education.

Depending on the scope and conclusions on student finance, the select committee may add a commentary to the evidence when published. Select committee commentaries can be hard-hitting and critical of government policy.

A tough report could have a significant effect on the post-election funding inquiry announced by education secretary David Blunkett. Mr Blunkett called for a debate on funding in his landmark speech on higher education at Greenwich University six weeks ago.

Committee member Gordon Marsden (Labour, Blackpool South) said: "I would not have thought it will pre-empt the government inquiry but we may choose to add a commentary."

Andrew Cubie is the first witness to appear before the committee on Monday. Mr Cubie's criticism of tuition fees and their effects on higher education participation rates in Scotland led to the Scottish Parliament abolishing upfront tuition fees and introducing grants for Scottish and European students.

This in turn prompted the government to introduce means-tested bursaries for mature and poor students in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.

Following Mr Cubie's session on April 3, the committee will hear from Nicol Stephen, Scottish deputy minister for enterprise and lifelong learning.

On April 10, it will be the turn of the National Union of Students and the Committee of Vice-Chanellors and Principals. On April 17, the committee will hear from Gareth Williams, of the Institute of Education, and Maggie Woodrow, of Westminster University and the European Access Network. They are due to be followed the same day by further and higher education minister Baroness Blackstone.

Details of further evidence sessions covering other aspects of the committee's higher education inquiry, such as quality assessment, are to be announced.

A committee spokesman said that it was unlikely that any other single aspect of the inquiry would warrant as many evidence sessions as student finance.

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October

Sponsored

Featured jobs

SETsquared Centre Director

University Of Bristol

Lecturer in Maritime Law, Teaching only

Liverpool John Moores University

AcoRD Officer

University Of Leeds

Marketing and Communication Manager

Heriot-watt University