Mea culpa: Exeter sorry for exam charges

February 11, 2010

An apology has been issued to students at the University of Exeter Business School after they were forced to pay to sit examinations managed by private companies.

Students studying modules in microeconomics and financial accounting at the school are required to take weekly online assessments set by Aplia and Accounting Lab.

To sit the tests, they need a code, which can be bought for about £17 online or obtained by purchasing textbooks for each module, which cost about £50.

Students have written to the university to complain about the charges, noting that the online assessments constituted between 10 and 20 per cent of the mark for each module.

University policy states that students must not be charged for sitting any exam for the first time.

A spokesman for the Exeter Business School said students had been paying for the tests for several years on the basis that the marks did not count towards their final module grades. This academic year, however, one lecturer had decided that the marks should count towards students' final scores.

The spokesman said the school was "entirely happy to accept that we got it wrong", and would be issuing refunds.

The tests are part of a variety of online materials supplied by publishers to accompany their textbooks, some of which require access codes, he said.

He added: "We have been very impressed by the richness of the materials, which exceed anything an individual lecturer could provide."

melanie.newman@tsleducation.com.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns