Linking NSS scores to job prospects is ‘inappropriate influence’, says Hefce

Ahead of TEF, funding council says universities must not seek to sway students’ responses

February 19, 2016
Man holding smiling and frowning faces

Universities that draw attention to the effect of National Student Survey results on graduates’ employment prospects could be made to rerun the questionnaire, the Higher Education Funding Council for England has warned.

Guidance issued by the funding council says that encouraging undergraduates “to reflect anything other than their true opinion of their experiences during their course” would amount to “inappropriate influence”.

In addition to being required to cover the costs of re-surveying students, institutions could be made to foot the bill for an independent investigation, or could have their results left out of the national release, with a note explaining that this was due to concerns about data quality.

Universities could also be made to undergo an audit of their processes in the following survey year, potentially having to have all internal survey material approved by Hefce.

Examples of inappropriate influence in the Hefce guidance range from explicit or implicit instruction on the type of responses that students should make to a much broader kind of guidance.

The document says that inappropriate influence could include “drawing attention to uses of the survey that may influence [students’] response”, such as its “use in league tables” and its “impact on employers’ perceptions” of institutions – and hence the job prospects of graduates.

The document was issued at a time when the results of the NSS are set to take on even greater importance, as a key metric in the teaching excellence framework. Institutions’ results could ultimately determine whether they are allowed to increase their tuition fees.

There are also growing concerns about the integrity of NSS results, with a study for Hefce highlighting the growing phenomenon of “yea-saying”, whereby students give the same (usually positive) answer to every question. In 2014, this accounted for 6.1 per cent of all online responses, up from 1 per cent in 2005, with the Hefce report warning that universities’ “overzealous promotion” of the NSS “could lead students to rate their institutions more generously”.

The guidance document says that concerns about the integrity of NSS results could be raised through funding bodies’ data management and audit processes, or by a third party.

A Hefce spokesman said that a policy of this kind had been in existence since the NSS was introduced.

“In the past, this document has not been publicly available but we feel it is beneficial to publish this so it is clear for students and institutions of the process involved,” the spokesman said. “It is not linked to the TEF or particular complaints.”

chris.havergal@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (2)

Fortunately, now that Peter Scott is no longer VC at Kingston, they are less likely to try to pull a fast one by pressuring students into changing their NSS ratings. But one must always be vigilant in monitoring universities that have been caught red-handed in the past.
HEFCE would appear, from this report, to be wanting to conceal the truth from students. If HEFCE believes that it is untrue that the NSS results might be used "in league tables" and might "impact on employers' perceptions" then it should come out and say so and university tutors doubtless would be happy to reinforce this assertion. But if these things are true--as of course they are, since these effects are the intended purpose of the NSS--then it is immoral of HEFCE to require tutors to conceal these facts from their students.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Viewed

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham