Liberal Democrats bid to win back the ‘university vote’

Vince Cable and Julian Huppert back party to overtake Labour in ‘university seats’

April 26, 2017
Liberal Democrats sign

Liberal Democrats believe that their standing among students and higher education staff is recovering after their tuition fees nightmare, as the party battles with Labour for the “university vote”.

Following Theresa May’s decision to call a snap election for 8 June, Labour and the Lib Dems will fight for the votes of university staff and students, which could be pivotal in a number of seats.

Times Higher Education surveys have found that university staff heavily backed Labour at the 2015 general election, while 90 per cent were planning to vote Remain in the European Union referendum.

Liberal Democrats will hope that their unambiguous call for a second referendum on the UK’s EU membership wins over voters in higher education.

Labour, for its part, might opt for a radical policy on tuition fees and higher education funding. John McDonnell, Labour’s shadow chancellor, told Times Higher Education prior to the announcement of the election that Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership campaign pledges to abolish tuition fees and reintroduce maintenance grants would become party policy.

Sir Vince Cable, the former Liberal Democrat business secretary who is aiming to win back the Twickenham seat that he lost in 2015, said that “for the university sector, there’s a lot at risk” in Brexit. “We’re certainly very keen in our pro-Remain battle that the university sector’s voice is heard,” he added.

“We are getting a revival of support [in universities],” Sir Vince continued. “There are quite strong Lib Dem branches in a lot of universities. Many of their students are willing to go out and argue the case for the [£9,000] tuition fees policy, which has had very considerable benefits for the university sector.”

Under former leader Nick Clegg, the Lib Dem leadership reversed their pre-2010 election pledge to abolish tuition fees and voted to treble fees to £9,000 when the party entered the coalition government, prompting claims of betrayal.

Sir Vince acknowledged that the party’s support among students was “clearly not on the same scale as pre-2010”, adding that “Corbyn probably has a following on campus, if not anywhere else”.

But he described the tuition fees row as “largely history” and argued that “although we made a bad mistake in making the pledge, the policy was absolutely right”.

Sir Vince suggested that Lib Dem candidates in “university towns” such as Cambridge, Bristol West and Bath “could well come back on the university vote”.

In Cambridge, Julian Huppert, lecturer in physics and public policy at the University of Cambridge, is seeking to return as the city’s MP after being unseated at the 2015 election by Labour by a margin of 599 votes.

Asked what stance he would take on access for EU students and staff to the UK, Dr Huppert said: “I think we should have something called free movement.” The UK would be “much better off if students could get here to study, to work, and for academics to get here to work as easily as currently, if not more easily”, he added.

In heavily pro-Remain Cambridge, Dr Huppert faces a pro-EU MP, Labour’s Daniel Zeichner, who voted against triggering Article 50.

Dr Huppert, who voted against raising fees to £9,000, said that he “found it pretty galling having voted against tuition fees myself to have people from Labour blame me when we all know that Labour introduced them and, through the Browne review, had plans to increase them significantly”.

He added: “But actually, I think students when I talk to them, have moved beyond that sort of problem. I think there are many greater problems – I think the way that Brexit is now increasing the interest rates students will have to face is a big problem. But I think the big problem students face at the moment, other than the loss of opportunity from Brexit, is the cost of living while they are students.”

Dr Huppert also said: “I think students are generally liberal, tolerant, internationally minded people. I think they are absolutely furious at the way their opportunities are being jeopardised by this Tory Brexit government with Labour cheering them on.”

john.morgan@timeshighereducation.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Technical Officer (Paramedic)

Staffordshire University

Professor in Marketing

Henley Business School

Lecturer or Senior Lecturer in Social Work

University Of The West Of Scotland

Research Service Manager

London School Of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (lshtm)
See all jobs

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (29 June 2017)

Academics who think they can do the work of professional staff better than professional staff themselves are not showing the kind of respect they expect from others

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

As the pay of BBC on-air talent is revealed, one academic comes clean about his salary

Senior academics at Teesside University put at risk of redundancy as summer break gets under way

University of Oxford

Reinstatement of professor over age discrimination must force rethink over ‘unfair’ retirement rules, say campaigners