Lib Dems to offer science ring-fence pledge

The Liberal Democrats will offer manifesto pledges to ring-fence the science budget and provide “further support” for Catapult centres.

August 21, 2014

Announcing the policies today, the party has framed them as part of a package of innovation measures “designed to help cutting edge UK businesses”.

It said its pledge on the ring-fence comes after past actions by Vince Cable, the business secretary, who “demanded that the £4.6 billion science research budget was ringfenced”. The continuation of the ring-fence was likely to have been up for discussion during negotiations ahead of the last budget.

Maintaining the science budget “respects the long-term nature of the projects funded and will help support Britain’s innovation research”, the Lib Dems said in the policy announcement.

The party also pledged “further support for the ‘Catapult’ programme, which bridges the gap between universities, research institutions and business through £100 million of funding over the next Parliament”.

The Technology Strategy Board has developed seven Catapults, which are loosely based on Germany’s Fraunhofer applied research institutes. A further two Catapults, in energy systems and precision medicine, are due to open next year.

Mr Cable said: “Supporting innovative businesses is crucial to building a stronger economy in Britain. There are hundreds of businesses and individuals across the country with a good idea, pioneering groundbreaking research or working tirelessly to bring their product to market.

“In government we have fought to protect funding for these innovations, and we will continue to do so in the next Parliament. We will not allow others scrap this vital funding because of a short-term outlook, rather than invest in the people who are building the businesses of tomorrow.”

john.morgan@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns