Leadership research in HE is ‘theoretically weak’

Literature on leadership development needs much improvement considering the sector’s importance to the UK economy, says report

April 30, 2016
Capsizing raft
Source: Alamy

Current literature on how to improve university leadership is “small-scale, fragmented and often theoretically weak”, a study has concluded.

In a damning assessment of research undertaken on higher education leadership development, a Leadership Foundation for Higher Education report concludes that there are few useful studies to illustrate how well UK universities are doing at training and supporting the next generation of university leaders.

Most of the studies are self-evaluations of small-scale projects carried out by individual institutions – a situation that raises “questions about the objectivity of reported outcomes”, says the report, titled The Impact of Leadership and Leadership Development: A Review of the Literature and Evidence, which was led by Sue Dopson, from the University of Oxford’s Saïd Business School and published on 27 April.

The report, which identified 41 pieces of relevant research on leadership development, also bemoans the lack of any longitudinal studies tracking the impact of leadership training over the course of several years.

“Given the importance of leadership development in the UK higher education sector and the amount of resource spent on it by higher education institutions as programme commissioners, the number of promising UK-based leadership interventions that we found to have a reliable evidence base and/or be theoretically well informed, is low,” says the report.

“A lot of the research is very weak,” said Ewan Ferlie, professor of public services management at King’s College London and one of the report’s co-authors, who characterised existing research as “very small-scale, local and atheoretical”.

“It might be two managers writing up an individual intervention they made at their university,” said Professor Ferlie, who compared this approach with larger multi-institutional research found in the US.

Echoing the report’s call for a “scaled-up and nationally significant research programme”, Professor Ferlie said that he would like to see researchers examine how leadership training had made an impact on higher education institutions, particularly those going through significant change.

“You could track the case of a university going through major change and see how leadership factors compared to other factors at play,” he said.

With higher education institutions soon likely to face tougher financial and regulatory challenges, as well as greater competition for students, focusing on good leadership practice could benefit the sector, Professor Ferlie added.

“The sector needs a leadership that is more adept at managing these changes effectively,” he said.


You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments


Print headline: Research on university leadership is ‘theoretically weak’

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

United Nations peace keeper

Understanding the unwritten rules of graduate study is vital if you want to get the most from your PhD supervision, say Kevin O'Gorman and Robert MacIntosh

David Parkins Christmas illustration (22 December 2016)

A Dickensian tale, set in today’s university

Eleanor Shakespeare illustration (5 January 2017)

Fixing problems in the academic job market by reducing the number of PhDs would homogenise the sector, argues Tom Cutterham

Houses of Parliament, Westminster, government

There really is no need for the Higher Education and Research Bill, says Anne Sheppard

poi, circus

Kate Riegle van West had to battle to bring her circus life and her academic life together