Laureate backs pop science

December 5, 2003

Academics who popularise science on television should be congratulated and not attacked, Nobel laureate John Sulston said last week, writes Anna Fazackerley.

Professor Sulston, who published the first draft sequence of the human genome, was speaking after a debate about genetics with schoolchildren at the Royal Society that featured science celebrity Robert Winston.

He argued that academic snobbery about science communication had lessened considerably, but said television was still an area of contention.

He said: "Robert Winston, Colin Blakemore, Richard Dawkins, Steve Jones and Nancy Rothwell all popularise science and they are very successful. But if you go on the box you get criticised."

Professor Rothwell, who presented a children's television programme called Are You Super-human with Gary Linneker, said there was still a fear of dumbing down among scientists.

But Professor Rothwell, a neuroscientist from Manchester University, argued that problems arose only when producers asked scientists to front programmes outside their particular area of expertise.

She added that the glamour of television "can attract people who want money and publicity rather than to communicate science".

Anthony Grayling, reader in philosophy at Birkbeck, University of London, said it was possible to do television engagingly: "You don't have to simplify something to make it clear."

Lord Winston said that he did not make television programmes for his own pleasure. "I have a very focused view that it is necessary and important," he said.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns