Labour hopes free tuition policy can tip balance in university seats

Labour MP and Corbyn critic Wes Streeting poses question of whether ‘bold’ pledge will boost student turnout

May 19, 2017
Labour party supporters
Source: Reuters
All or nothing: will Jeremy Corbyn’s education pledge attract younger voters?

Labour targeting of “university seats” in the general election could help to ensure that Theresa May does not have a “blank cheque” with which to scupper higher education interests in the future, according to one of the party’s MPs, who hopes to retain his marginal seat.

Wes Streeting spoke to Times Higher Education following the launch of the party’s manifesto on 16 May, in which it committed to scrapping tuition fees from September and reintroducing student maintenance grants, putting the cost at £11.2 billion a year – by far the most expensive single pledge in the manifesto.

The former National Union of Students president, who is battling to hold on to the Ilford North seat he won by a majority of just 589 in the 2015 election, said: “Labour MPs are fighting to…stop Theresa May from having a blank cheque for the next few years.

“In terms of the university seats that will be contested at this election, people know that by voting for the Liberal Democrats in Cambridge or Bristol West, they would effectively be helping to return a Conservative government…[that] certainly wouldn’t stand up for the interests of the higher education sector.

“The turnout of students and young people generally in previous elections has been abysmal and it’ll be interesting to see [whether] something as bold as restoring grants and scrapping tuition fees will motivate students to turn out in greater numbers.”

In a recent THE data analysis on the marginal constituencies where student voters could have the most impact, University of Oxford associate professor in political sociology Stephen Fisher said that a two percentage point boost to Labour’s vote in student-heavy areas on the Tory target list “might be enough" to help Labour “hold on to a handful” of seats.

Mr Streeting, a long-standing graduate tax advocate, said he “would’ve probably chosen to spend the money on early years and school budgets, where it could make the big difference to social mobility. But that was the pledge Corbyn made when he was elected leader of the Labour Party; he’s sticking to his guns and people will know this is something he cares very much about.”

Many in the sector are sceptical of Mr Corbyn’s policy.

Andy Westwood, a former special adviser to Labour’s John Denham in his time as secretary of state for universities, now professor of further and higher education at the University of Wolverhampton, said we can “pretty much dismiss” the policies.

He added: “Given the oft-quoted support for Labour and Corbyn among students and staff at universities, it’s on campus where this vision may be most popular. But that doesn't mean it’s likely to happen.”

john.elmes@timeshighereducation.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (29 June 2017)

Academics who think they can do the work of professional staff better than professional staff themselves are not showing the kind of respect they expect from others

A podium constructed out of wood

There are good reasons why some big names are missing from our roster

Senior academics at Teesside University put at risk of redundancy as summer break gets under way

As the pay of BBC on-air talent is revealed, one academic comes clean about his salary

Thorns and butterflies

Conditions that undermine the notion of scholarly vocation – relentless work, ubiquitous bureaucracy – can cause academics acute distress and spur them to quit, says Ruth Barcan