Katie Hopkins and Will Self debate value of arts degrees

A debate on whether “an arts degree is a waste of time and money” saw the motion decisively defeated.

March 9, 2014

The event, organised by the Spectator magazine and Brewin Dolphin investment consultants, took place in London’s Shaw Theatre on 4 March.

Former Apprentice contestant and Sun columnist Katie Hopkins argued that “we no longer have the luxury of the liberal arts”.

When it was announced that she was taking part in the debate, she told the audience, Nicholas Stern, president of the British Academy, had made a point of describing her as “utterly stupid”. Yet her advice to young people was: “Don’t follow your heart; follow jobs”. It was “mediaeval”, she added, that “we still teach students on university campuses”.

Julia Hobsbawm, founder of the networking business Editorial Intelligence, described the snobbery she had faced earlier in her career because she did not have an arts degree, suggesting that today’s “arts graduates are not moving into a market which can fully support them”.

Spectator columnist and contributing editor Harry Cole called his degree in social anthropology “an MA in sweet FA”. He had worked out that it had cost him £20 an hour “to be lectured by an incomprehensible Frenchman with a goatee” and wondered why “some [academic] subjects spend more time questioning if they are a subject than being a subject”. Could it really be right that “our universities are splitting at the seams with time-wasters like me”?

Arguing against the motion, entrepreneur Doug Richard declared that his opponents wanted to “reduce us all to vocational economic drones”, when in reality an arts degree was “a core opportunity to learn to think, be creative and innovate”.

Anthony Seldon, headmaster of Wellington College, claimed the debate was really “about the future of humankind, of living life fully”.

Novelist Will Self, professor of contemporary thought at Brunel University, agreed that it was all about “spiritual values and nurturing the soul”. Politicians anxious about “unassimilable immigrants” should come to his classes to “see young women in hijabs discussing Spinoza’s religious philosophy”.

And those who believed that face-to-face contact no longer had a place in education should “start bringing up their kids on Skype”.

matthew.reisz@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (1)

Alongside traditional subjects, the recent introduction of GCSE, 'A' level TechBacc vocational qualifications and accredited 'Trailblazer' apprenticeships, seem tailor-made for the growing specialist Academy and UTC schools sector. Interestingly their web sites, like the Independent and top State schools, typically strongly feature extra-curricula activities and not least liberal arts (and sciences) study needed for a well rounded education

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

United Nations peace keeper

Understanding the unwritten rules of graduate study is vital if you want to get the most from your PhD supervision, say Kevin O'Gorman and Robert MacIntosh

David Parkins Christmas illustration (22 December 2016)

A Dickensian tale, set in today’s university

Eleanor Shakespeare illustration (5 January 2017)

Fixing problems in the academic job market by reducing the number of PhDs would homogenise the sector, argues Tom Cutterham

Houses of Parliament, Westminster, government

There really is no need for the Higher Education and Research Bill, says Anne Sheppard

poi, circus

Kate Riegle van West had to battle to bring her circus life and her academic life together