How is eLife measuring up?

In 2012, the open access biomedical journal eLife was launched to challenge the dominance of titles such as Nature, Science and Cell

June 16, 2016
How is eLife measuring up? infographic (16 June 2016)

View high-resolution version


This month, eLife’s backers – the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, the Max Planck Society and the Wellcome Trust – said that they would extend support until 2022 with a £25 million boost.

Four years on, how is eLife doing?

It is now publishing as many papers as Nature, with acceptance rates falling from more than one in four when it was set up to about 15 per cent last year.

Along with many other academic critics, eLife rejects the use of journal impact factors, which measure the average number of citations papers receive. However, the measure remains watched by some researchers hoping for promotion, and on this count, eLife remains behind Nature.

Science declined to give year-by-year breakdowns for acceptance rates and papers published. A spokeswoman said that about 800 papers were published each year, and 6 to 7 per cent of submissions were accepted. Science’s journal impact factor has remained in the low 30s throughout the period.

david.matthews@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Related articles

POSTSCRIPT:

Print headline: Taking stock: how is eLife measuring up?

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns