Humanities research ‘needs firm foundations’

The importance of a durable European study infrastructure is explored in the book Facing the Future

July 31, 2014

The ways in which “research infrastructures” provide “an indispensable foundation for cutting-edge research in Europe” are explored in a new book.

Arising from a conference held in Berlin late last year, Facing the Future: European Research Infrastructure for the Humanities and Social Sciences provides “a comprehensive view of the state of the art of pan-European interdisciplinary research”, looking at administrative data; longitudinal research and bio-social research; digital humanities; and digital communication and social media.

Contributors stress the role of the social sciences and humanities in addressing challenges such as “employment, demographic change and ageing populations, migration, poverty, climate change, food and energy security, European cohesion and cultural diversity”, and in reviving a sense of “a European cultural heritage”. Yet they can do so, argues Peter Farago, director of the Swiss Centre of Expertise in the Social Sciences, only if “durable institutions, technical tools and platforms, and/or services…are put into place for supporting and enhancing research”.

Such research infrastructures, he goes on, “need to be durable and stable on a long-term basis to avoid losing accumulated benefits” yet also highly “adaptab[le] to the changing needs of the scientific community”. Typical problems to be overcome include “the tension between open data access and confidentiality; fragmentation, funding and time-frames issues”.

A concluding chapter flags up the need for “facilitating research cooperation and interdisciplinarity” and “tapping new sources of (big) data”. Although “the notion of ‘one researcher, one project, one dataset’ is gradually being superseded by a culture of sharing, cooperation and re-use of data”, argue the authors, “there is still much work to be done”. A key factor is the lack of incentives for researchers to “invest time and energy into preparing their data for secondary use. The hard work involved with producing, and also sharing, high-quality data is currently not being appropriately rewarded by journals, universities and funding agencies with professional credit.”

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Reader's comments (1)

The E-Book Version of that Book can be downloaded for free on the ALLEA-Website:

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Viewed

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham