Hefce looks at overseas links for research excellence

Willetts sees potential in tie-ups with Australia, New Zealand and Hong Kong

April 10, 2014

Source: Corbis

New horizons: a more international REF could lead to efficiencies and provide extra information about the UK’s performance

UK academics could have their research assessed alongside scholars from Australia, New Zealand and Hong Kong under plans being considered by the Higher Education Funding Council for England.

David Willetts, the universities and science minister, has instructed the council to investigate whether it would be possible to include other countries and foreign universities in future research excellence framework exercises.

The idea was suggested to Mr Willetts by David Eastwood, vice-chancellor of the University of Birmingham, who told Times Higher Education that assessing UK research alongside work done outside the country would “give you real international comparability”.

A more international REF “would be much more effective than the current exercise. It would carry more weight,” he said. Expanding the exercise would also lead to efficiencies and cost savings, he added.

Professor Eastwood envisaged an exercise jointly run by the UK, Australia, New Zealand and Hong Kong (Hefce is already helping Hong Kong to set up its own research assessment exercise).

In this scenario, the assessment panels that judge the quality of scholars’ research would be “reflective” of the number of academics in each country, he said.

Research quality would be assessed by these joint panels but it would be left up to individual governments to decide how the results translated into funding, Professor Eastwood added.

Asked whether the US could join a future joint exercise, he said that research funding there was not distributed in the same way as in the four countries mentioned.

But if a joint REF was developed, “then there wouldn’t be anything to stop groups of institutions buying in to a quality assessment service”, he anticipated, as long as they did “high quality” research.

David Sweeney, director for research, innovation and skills at Hefce, said the council hoped to come to a view on the proposal by the end of the year.

The primary benefit of an international REF would be the extra information provided about the UK’s research performance, he said, which would complement international research reviews already conducted by Hefce.

After the announcement by Mr Willetts on 3 April, it was suggested on social media that the proposal could open the door to Scotland remaining part of the REF if it elects to become independent this September.

But Dr Sweeney said that the new investigation had “nothing to do with Scottish independence” because it was already assumed that “in the event of independence the opportunity [for Scotland] to take part [in the rest of the UK’s REF] would be available”. He did reveal that countries and bodies “from Europe and elsewhere” had requested to join the UK’s exercise.

Speaking about the idea last week, Mr Willetts explained that “it might be quite handy if you’re in Hong Kong to get some sense of ‘How good is our medical school? What is the quality of the economics we do here?’ for your university to be assessed as part of the REF.”

But any countries that joined would have to cover their costs, he said, and there were also “potential risks to the effectiveness and integrity of the national process” that would have to be investigated.

david.matthews@tsleducation.com

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (2)

Willetts might learn something from contact with the other three systems. New Zealand has recently evaluated the PBRF and included researchers in those asked for feedback on the experience. The recent HEFCE invitation restricted replies to HEIs, and then only one, so excluding those most affected and implying that management views are more important and that managing the exercise takes precedence over the research itself. He might also note that Hong Kong uses all the four Carnegie 'scholarships' in its RAE, so locating research as discovery within the broader context of integration, application and dissemination/teaching. If he goes back in history a little, he will discover that Australia rejected adotion of the UK model in 1997 on the basis of the findings of a HEFCE funded project on the impact of the RAE. They have stuck to that decsion ever since, through several changes of government.
Great, so let's export a cumbersome, expensive and ultimately time-wasting exercise to the colonies (again)! Sensibly the Aussies and Kiwis developed lighter-touch approaches to Britain's original RAE model and reserved most of their time for the really matter at hand – research.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Post-doctoral Research Associate in Chemistry

University Of Western Australia

PACE Data Support Officer

Macquarie University - Sydney Australia

Associate Lecturer in Nursing

Central Queensland University
See all jobs

Most Commented

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Canal houses, Amsterdam, Netherlands

All three of England’s for-profit universities owned in Netherlands

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

Alexander Wedderburn

Former president of the British Psychological Society remembered

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham