Graduate employers 'not keen on the Hear'

Fewer than 15 per cent of graduate employers have said they will use a new system for recording student achievement when choosing who to recruit.

July 10, 2013

The Higher Education Achievement Report details specific module marks and extracurricular activities in an attempt to give a more rounded view of an applicant than a simple degree class.

But according to the Graduate Recruitment Survey 2013 Summer Review, more than a quarter of employers had not heard of the Hear, and of those that have, just under a fifth said they would use it during recruitment.

Of those employers who had heard of the Hear but decided not to use it, almost two thirds explained that they were happy with the recruitment tools they already use.

Twenty-three per cent said the Hear was “new and untried” while 13 per cent said it contained too much information.

Some companies also said that it would be too difficult to use because not all universities had adopted it.

The Hear has the backing of Universities UK, but has not been universally embraced by institutions, with the universities of Oxford and Cambridge both deciding against adoption.

The survey, commissioned by the Association of Graduate Recruiters (AGR), also predicts a drop of 3.9 per cent in graduate vacancies this summer.

This contrasts with another recent survey, The Graduate Market in 2013, which found that vacancies were up 4.6 per cent this year on 2012.

The report is based on an online survey of 209 members of the AGR, who are generally large firms that have specific recruitment programmes for graduates.

david.matthews@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns