Gove launches review of teacher training courses

Education secretary Michael Gove has announced an independent review of the quality and effectiveness of initial teacher training courses.

May 1, 2014

The review, which will report to Mr Gove by the end of the year, will look across the full range of ITT courses available and aims to find out what “defines effective ITT practice”, how “effective” the current system is and recommend where improvements can be made.

It will also look for recommendations “on ways to improve choice in the system by improving the transparency of course content and method”.

The review, whose panel will be appointed in the coming weeks, is to be chaired by Andrew Carter, headteacher of South Farnham School and ITT lead on the Teaching Schools Council.

“While we have already taken steps to improve teacher training, including through the popular School Direct route, it is right that we look at how we can ensure all courses are providing the best possible training,” said Mr Gove.

Mr Carter added that because of the “significant change” in education since 2010, it was “paramount that trainees are prepared to face the demands of the 21st-century classroom”.

The review comes in the aftermath of the rapid rise of the government’s School Direct policy, under which trainees are recruited directly by schools rather than first completing a course of higher study. The resulting loss of postgraduate teacher training places allocated to universities has left some institutions with huge losses of funding and led some to abandon postgraduate certificates of education altogether.

James Noble-Rogers, executive director of the Universities Council for the Education of Teachers (UCET), welcomed the review but added that he would like it to additionally cover “either the length of initial teacher education programmes or how to secure better synergy between ITT and early professional development”.

He added that he would expect the university sector to be “fully involved” with the review process and that there would be “no pre-conceptions” as to which is the best route into teaching.

“The outcome of any review should not result in too much prescription in regards the content of ITT,” Mr Noble-Rogers said. “In a market-driven system, consumers (be they trainees or schools) should, subject to consistency with national frameworks, be able to choose the course content that best meets their needs.”

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Monster behind man at desk

Despite all that’s been done to improve doctoral study, horror stories keep coming. Here three students relate PhD nightmares while two academics advise on how to ensure a successful supervision

Sir Christopher Snowden, former Universities UK president, attacks ratings in wake of Southampton’s bronze award

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride

Reflection of man in cracked mirror

To defend the values of reason from political attack we need to be more discriminating about the claims made in its name, says John Hendry

But the highest value UK spin-off companies mainly come from research-intensive universities, latest figures show