For-profits unwelcome, UCU academic poll finds

A survey of more than 500 professors has found that eight out of 10 believe that for-profit institutions should not have access to state subsidies such as taxpayer-funded student loans.

June 16, 2011

The study also found that 88 per cent "strongly disagree" with any relaxation of regulations that allows such providers access to public subsidies, while 81 per cent think that the expansion of the commercial sector would harm the reputation of UK higher education.

According to the report from the University and College Union, which surveyed 506 senior academics last month, there is an "overwhelming consensus" that an easing of restrictions on for-profit providers would put standards at risk.

More than four-fifths (85 per cent) of the professors questioned, who are all UCU members, say they think courses offered by for-profits would be of "lower quality" than those at publicly funded universities, while 79 per cent claim that employers would also take such a view.

The survey has been released ahead of the government's White Paper on the future of higher education, due to be published in the next few weeks, which is expected to lay out regulations on how the for-profit sector accesses public funds.

Currently, students on "designated courses" at some for-profits can access state loans, but ministers are known to be keen to extend this entitlement to encourage more competition within the higher education sector.

The UCU warns that there is a danger that the UK could experience the same problems as the US, where large for-profit institutions that rely on fees paid through student loans have been accused of mis-selling degrees.

The survey also found that 99 per cent of respondents believe that for-profit providers' degree-awarding powers should be subject to regular review. This is currently the case.

Almost as many (93 per cent) think that commercial providers should have the same obligations to widen participation as publicly funded institutions.

The report also quotes academics, including Daniel Waldram, professor of theoretical physics at Imperial College London. He said that the for-profit model was "wholly inappropriate for providing high-quality university education appropriate to the needs of the UK".

simon.baker@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Monster behind man at desk

Despite all that’s been done to improve doctoral study, horror stories keep coming. Here three students relate PhD nightmares while two academics advise on how to ensure a successful supervision

Sir Christopher Snowden, former Universities UK president, attacks ratings in wake of Southampton’s bronze award

opinion illustration

Eliminating cheating services, even if it were possible, would do nothing to address students’ and universities’ lack of interest in learning, says Stuart Macdonald

Female professor

New data show proportion of professors who are women has declined at some institutions

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride