‘Failing’ institutions will not be fined

Proposal for financial penalties to maintain standards is rejected following sector-wide consultation

April 9, 2015

Universities have rejected the idea of fining institutions that fail to meet basic academic standards, a conference has heard.

Summarising responses to a sector-wide consultation on potential changes to quality assurance, Steve Egan, deputy chief executive of the Higher Education Funding Council for England, said that higher education institutions of all types had opposed fines for those who failed to maintain standards.

“That [idea] got universal rejection as it would lead to students suffering,” said Mr Egan at an event in London on 30 March to discuss the regulation of higher education.

Hefce is currently consulting on a “risk-based, proportionate, affordable and low-burden” quality-assurance system that it hopes to implement from 2017.

It says that a new system is required as the sector is “undergoing rapid change” and the work now carried out by the Quality Assurance Agency may be put out to tender. As a result, parts of the QAA’s work may be parcelled out to a variety of bodies.

The review may also lead to penalties for institutions that fail to meet expectations. One punishment under consideration is the removal of degree-awarding powers, the control of which is set to be transferred from the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills to Hefce.

Mr Egan said that only a small number of the 187 respondents to the consultation had supported the use of this “nuclear option”.

Madeleine Atkins, Hefce’s chief executive, told the conference that “the sector is asking for a risk-based approach” to quality assurance, “not a heavy-handed one”. But there was division about whether a quality-assurance system should explicitly seek to encourage improvement at all levels or simply “get out of the way” once standards had been met, Professor Atkins said.

Hefce, which has held 13 roundtable events and two plenary sessions across the UK since it announced its review in October, is due to publish its draft plans for quality assurance after the general election. A second stage of consultation will then take place ahead of a decision in September.


Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

United Nations peace keeper

Understanding the unwritten rules of graduate study is vital if you want to get the most from your PhD supervision, say Kevin O'Gorman and Robert MacIntosh

Eleanor Shakespeare illustration (5 January 2017)

Fixing problems in the academic job market by reducing the number of PhDs would homogenise the sector, argues Tom Cutterham

Houses of Parliament, Westminster, government

There really is no need for the Higher Education and Research Bill, says Anne Sheppard

poi, circus

Kate Riegle van West had to battle to bring her circus life and her academic life together

man with frozen beard, Lake Louise, Canada

Australia also makes gains in list of most attractive English-speaking nations as US slips