EU referendum: academics see immigration as ‘hugely positive’

THE survey respondents tend to view EU free movement as good for individuals, universities and society

June 16, 2016
Students waiting for bus, Plaza del Poeta Iglesias, Salamanca, Spain
Source: Alamy

Those working in UK higher education tend to see immigration and freedom of movement within the European Union as positives, citing them as key reasons to back continued membership of the bloc, responses to the Times Higher Education survey suggest.

The referendum survey included an open question asking respondents for comments on the reasons why they plan to vote Remain or Leave.

The responses bear out the theory that those who work in a field where they are beneficiaries of globalisation – who do not perceive their jobs to be under threat or their wages under pressure from immigration – are more likely to favour staying in the EU.

One survey respondent said of the case for Remain: “It’s cultural, economic, about free movement and opportunities to work in and collaborate with those in the EU. I also think immigration is a hugely positive thing for the academy and for the UK economy and that we benefit far more than we risk by welcoming people from across the world.”

One highlighted student mobility within the EU: “I have both been an international exchange student myself in the past, and worked closely with Erasmus exchange students and with international partners, and it is also clear to me that the UK, and universities in particular, benefit socially and culturally from the rich perspectives gained through exchanges and through freedom of movement.”

Another dead-panned that “being married to a citizen of another EU member state, I quite like being able to live in the same country as my wife and children”.

EU referendum: nine out of 10 university staff back Remain

For some, the choice was clear. “It seems that, on both narrowly selfish grounds, and on the broader arguments, it would be a strange choice indeed for a higher education worker to vote Leave,” said one respondent.

Another said: “So many reasons to remain it is hard to know where to start; everything from selfishness (my access to EU grants and PhD students, fear of almost certain tax hikes and reduced services upon Brexit) through the mundane (I wonder who will clean the toilets at Guy’s Hospital if immigrants are removed?) all the way to distrust of Brexiteers, who seem increasingly bonkers.”

Some respondents expressed strong hostility towards the Leave campaign. One said that “Brexiteers” have “relied on prejudice, economic ignorance and, let’s be honest, racism”. Another said they would vote Remain “in recognition of the basic facts that both the UK and the EU are weaker apart than together. And because I’m not a bigot.”

Among the much smaller number of Brexit supporters in the survey, one argued that a “fairer immigration system which does not disadvantage those outside of the EU could make Britain a much more attractive option for prospective overseas students in the long term, as they have more confidence that they will be able to secure work and stay in Britain after graduating”.

Meanwhile, another respondent said they were “leaning towards Remain but cannot abide the rhetoric” coming from its campaign about damage to household finances if the UK leaves the EU. The respondent thought that a bit rich given “our profession has seen a real term decrease in salary and there’s no way I will ever be able to afford a house in Oxford”.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments


Print headline: Immigration: academics see it as ‘hugely positive’

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Monster behind man at desk

Despite all that’s been done to improve doctoral study, horror stories keep coming. Here three students relate PhD nightmares while two academics advise on how to ensure a successful supervision

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride

Sir Christopher Snowden, former Universities UK president, attacks ratings in wake of Southampton’s bronze award

Reflection of man in cracked mirror

To defend the values of reason from political attack we need to be more discriminating about the claims made in its name, says John Hendry

But the highest value UK spin-off companies mainly come from research-intensive universities, latest figures show