EPSRC funding shifts power up energy research

Analysis reveals the winners and losers under ‘shaping capabilities’ programme

March 5, 2015

Download spreadsheet showing EPSRC funding shifts


Energy research has been the big winner under the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council’s controversial shaping capabilities programme, figures reveal.

In 2011, the EPSRC divided its research portfolio into 113 subjects and announced whether it would grow, maintain or reduce funding levels in each. The policy, now known as “balancing capabilities”, sparked huge controversy amid accusations of insufficient consultation.

Synthetic organic chemists were especially vociferous. Now, an EPSRC analysis reveals that, of all the subjects slated for cuts, their funding has shrunk the most as a proportion of the EPSRC budget: between April 2011 and April 2014, it fell 0.79 percentage points.

But there were bigger losses in three subjects meant to be maintained: built environment (down 1.32 percentage points), sensors and instrumentation (down 1.04), and engineering design (down 0.94). They account for three of 16 “action plans” that the EPSRC unveiled alongside its analysis.

The action plans are for subjects that have moved “along the wrong trajectory”, that face a changed funding environment or that have not met other strategic aims.

Of the 54 subjects that have shrunk, 13 were scheduled to do so, while three were slated to grow. Two of the latter – water engineering as well as radio frequency and microwave devices – have action plans.

Of the 59 that have grown, 14 were scheduled to do so and one was due to reduce.

Energy storage recorded the most spectacular growth: its share of funding rose from 0. per cent to 2.07 per cent, the sixth largest. Energy efficiency also mushroomed, by 1.45 percentage points, becoming the EPSRC’s second largest subject.

The biggest area, accounting for 3.24 per cent of the budget, is now manufacturing technologies, which rose by 0.98 percentage points despite being scheduled to be maintained.

The EPSRC said that its council is “pleased the strategy seems to be bedding in well, with just a light adjustment required in a number of areas”.

paul.jump@tesglobal.com

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Postdoctoral Fellowship in Electrochemistry

Norwegian University Of Science & Technology -ntnu

Research Positions in Nanotechnology

Norwegian University Of Science & Technology -ntnu

PhD Fellowship in Electrocatalysis

Norwegian University Of Science & Technology -ntnu

Lecturer in Business and Management

De Montfort University

Reader in International Development

University Of Wolverhampton
See all jobs

Most Commented

Doctoral study can seem like a 24-7 endeavour, but don't ignore these other opportunities, advise Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O'Gorman

Matthew Brazier illustration (9 February 2017)

How do you defeat Nazis and liars? Focus on the people in earshot, says eminent Holocaust scholar Deborah Lipstadt

Improvement, performance, rankings, success

Phil Baty sets out why the World University Rankings are here to stay – and why that's a good thing

Warwick vice-chancellor Stuart Croft on why his university reluctantly joined the ‘flawed’ teaching excellence framework

people dressed in game of thrones costume

Old Germanic languages are back in vogue, but what value are they to a modern-day graduate? Alice Durrans writes