Digital aids: students reveal ‘benefits’ of technology

High-tech resources are yet to transform the nature of university learning, and often it is the ‘mundane’ use of technologies that aid study

April 9, 2015

Source: Reuters

Help at hand: it is ‘often the more prosaic’ use of technology that aids learning

Lecturers need to develop a better grasp of how technology can be used to facilitate learning, and better understand the way in which students use digital resources.

This is according to a paper by academics at Monash University in Melbourne, who surveyed more than 1,600 undergraduates at two universities in Australia and found that while digital technologies are a “central element of undergraduate education”, they are “clearly not ‘transforming’ the nature of university teaching and learning”.

“University educators perhaps need to temper enthusiasms for what might be achieved through technology-enabled learning and develop better understandings of the realities of students’ encounters with digital technology,” the paper, “What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning”, finds.

Published in the Studies in Higher Education journal, the research highlights a number of distinct digital “benefits” of technology identified by participating students. These include the “organising and managing the logistics of studying” (46.9 per cent of respondents say this is a benefit); “flexibility of place and location” of studying (32.7 per cent); and time-saving (30.6 per cent). Michael Henderson, senior lecturer in the Faculty of Education at Monash and co-author of the study, said that there was “considerable evidence” that technology was aiding learning but that it was not always “the cutting edge or headline use of technologies but often the more prosaic or mundane”.

Other findings from the same survey, which are to be published in a separate forthcoming paper by a team from Monash and Griffith University, in Queensland, reveal the ways in which students say technology is impeding their work.

The most commonly cited problem is “disruption” (28 per cent of respondents) – instances where technology has failed to function, preventing them from working. Diversion (25 per cent), where technology – either their own or someone else’s – distracts them from the task at hand, and difficulty (24 per cent), where technology might not be the most suitable tool for a scholarly task, are also cited.

Finally, 19 per cent of students said that technology could be a “detriment” to their learning, citing “death by PowerPoint” in lectures and poor quality digital learning materials as examples.

chris.parr@tesglobal.com

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Laurel and Hardy sawing a plank of wood

Working with other academics can be tricky so follow some key rules, say Kevin O'Gorman and Robert MacIntosh

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder