David Latchman in investigation into alleged research misconduct

Papers from Birkbeck master’s research group among ‘an unspecified number’ being looked at by University College London

January 27, 2015

Journal papers from the research group of David Latchman, master of Birkbeck, University of London, are among a number under investigation by University College London for possible research misconduct.

Allegations about image misuse were made last year by the prolific pseudonymous whistleblower known as Clare Francis. Professor Latchman has led Birkbeck since 2003 but maintains a lab at UCL, where he is professor of human genetics.

On 16 January, a 2002 paper of which Professor Latchman is senior author was retracted by the Journal of Biological Chemistry. The retraction notice simply says it has been “withdrawn by the authors” - of whom there are another three.

Martha Fedor, editor-in-chief and a professor at the Scripps Research Institute in California, said the journal “maintains strict confidentiality in these matters”, so was unable to give any further information. The page on the PubPeer post-publication peer review website relating to the paper, to which Ms Francis referred investigators, alleges that the paper reuses an image from a 2001 paper, authored by the same four authors plus others.

The 2002 paper’s first author, Anastasis Stephanou, a reader in molecular and cell biology at UCL, confirmed to the Retraction Watch website that this was the reason for the retraction, and attributed it to error.

The previous week, another two papers authored by a different set of researchers and Professor Latchman were corrected by the same journal. In total, questions are raised on PubPeer about 25 papers on which Professor Latchman is an author.

In a statement, UCL confirms it is carrying out research misconduct investigations into an unspecified number of papers relating to an unspecified number of its academics.

“The process is ongoing and it would be inappropriate for us to comment about named individuals at this stage,” it says. “Some errors have been identified in eight publications, and appropriate retractions have taken place. This should not be misinterpreted as an indication that individual authors have been either knowingly or deliberately involved in misconduct, because our processes are not yet complete.”

Professor Latchman did not respond to a request for comment but a spokesman for Birkbeck said: “Professor Latchman is a highly respected geneticist and higher education leader. Birkbeck reiterates the need for the processes currently under way to be completed appropriately and rapidly in fairness to all concerned.”

paul.jump@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (3)

He must also be one of the UK's highest paid researchers as his Birkbeck package is over £380,000 this year
The retracted paper has been commented on at Pubpeer. https://pubpeer.com/publications/F252B08120B2EA74A54D6A76E2EE3F
"Birkbeck reiterates the need for the processes currently under way to be completed appropriately and rapidly in fairness to all concerned.” The complaints were made in December 2013. The investigative panel was not convened until the summer of 2014. http://retractionwatch.com/2015/01/20/prominent-geneticist-nets-retraction-two-corrections-lot-questions/

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

question marks PhD study

Selecting the right doctorate is crucial for success. Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O'Gorman share top 10 tips on how to pick a PhD

India, UK, flag

Sir Keith Burnett reflects on what he learned about international students while in India with the UK prime minister

Pencil lying on open diary

Requesting a log of daily activity means that trust between the institution and the scholar has broken down, says Toby Miller

Application for graduate job
Universities producing the most employable graduates have been ranked by companies around the world in the Global University Employability Ranking 2016
Construction workers erecting barriers

Directly linking non-EU recruitment to award levels in teaching assessment has also been under consideration, sources suggest