Cost threat to teacher courses

October 26, 1995

Some universities may pull out of teacher training because of plans published today to set a common price for teacher education courses in England from 1997 onwards.

The scheme would also rate providers according to quality, according to the consultative document from the Government's Teacher Training Agency.

"Price tariffs" are to be the basis for a new funding methodology similar to that introduced for further education colleges. They are designed to eradicate what Anthea Millett, agency chief executive, calls "the current financial maze under which the agency can pay between Pounds 810 to more than Pounds 3,700 to different providers for exactly the same provision".

John Howson, director of educationat Oxford Brookes University, warned that institutions might withdraw from teacher training. "Vice chancellors may feel that this is becoming too much hard work, particularly in some of the larger universities," he said.

The agency based its report on a review of teacher training carried out by Coopers and Lybrand. It acknowledges that, although a common price will be set after an analysis of "real costs", including the total funding available to TTA, this will need to vary, for example between phases, secondary subjects and routes into the profession.

The report says that the methodology would enable new providers to start up as well as existing ones to be stopped. The agency wants its pricing policy to encourage recruitment to shortage subjects.

It believes that over-recruitment should be rewarded by extra numbers and funding the following year and under-recruitment penalised, as would over-recruitment in areas with excess applicants, for example primary training.

Funding for courses will also be geared to output. The agency proposes that 10 per cent of a course's funding should be withheld pending a successful outcome, that is, a student who has completed training and secured a teaching post.

Coopers and Lybrand stressed that institutions that have received more funding to meet their higher investment will no longer do so, and will have to cut costs. There should be no price difference between full or part-time courses or on the basis of geography, with the exception of inner city providers.

Ian Kane, the chair of the University Council for the Education of teachers described the whole pricing methodology and linking of funding to quality as arcane.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns