Conor Gearty to ‘grill’ his LSE colleagues on camera

Senior scholar says his filmed 5-minute debates may expose the “tensions and contradictions’ in academics’ work

May 15, 2014

Source: LSE

Heat conductor: Gearty ‘grillings’ may find ‘tensions and contradictions’ in research

Scholars at the London School of Economics have agreed to submit to “grillings” by a colleague in a new series of short, sharp video debates.

The idea arose, said Conor Gearty, professor of human rights law and director of the LSE’s Institute of Public Affairs, in discussions with Claire Sanders, head of communications and public affairs, about creating “opportunities for academics to communicate their research interests more effectively and widely, and in a fashion that is naturally accessible”.

“Since my name begins with G and we wanted to capture a sense, not necessarily of the adversarial, but at least of some tension”, said Professor Gearty, they hit on The Gearty Grillings as a series name.

First in the spotlight was Tony Travers, director of LSE London, a research centre at the institution, explaining his ideas on decentralisation. Next up, and online last week, was Tim Besley, school professor of economics and political science, looking at the economic crash, why China could be heading for trouble – and why we still need economists.

Candidates for future Gearty Grillings include Heather Jones, associate professor of international history, on prisoners during the First World War. Housing policy and fracking are also soon up for debate.

Each “grilling” is around five minutes long and recorded in a single take in the LSE’s new studio. Professor Gearty said he hoped “to use these cross-examinations to challenge academics on the tensions, and possibly the contradictions, in their work” and although he had no desire to be the next Jeremy Paxman, he believed this would elicit the best answers.

“It’s no good when you say: ‘Professor, you’ve done tremendous work on x – please tell me about it’,” he suggested. “Academics are at their best when challenged and asked to justify their work from first principles…They love talking about their work in a way which makes sense without being linked to a major news story [as is usually the case when they appear on the radio or television].”

Since the LSE focuses exclusively on the social sciences, Professor Gearty was confident he could acquire sufficient background knowledge for the interviews through reading.

Indeed, he believed it was probably easier for him to “grill” academics outside his own research areas, “since then my judgements are professional, designed to elicit the best interview. The idea is to ask the questions a non-specialist might ask. If I let my own views in, it could become a senior common room conversation where we have so many shared assumptions that we lose other people.”

matthew.reisz@tsleducation.com

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Monster behind man at desk

Despite all that’s been done to improve doctoral study, horror stories keep coming. Here three students relate PhD nightmares while two academics advise on how to ensure a successful supervision

opinion illustration

Eliminating cheating services, even if it were possible, would do nothing to address students’ and universities’ lack of interest in learning, says Stuart Macdonald

Female professor

New data show proportion of professors who are women has declined at some institutions

Sir Christopher Snowden, former Universities UK president, attacks ratings in wake of Southampton’s bronze award

Reflection of man in cracked mirror

To defend the values of reason from political attack we need to be more discriminating about the claims made in its name, says John Hendry