CMA tells universities to improve treatment of students

Three institutions agree to changes over fees, course costs and progression

July 22, 2016
Small print

Three universities have been told to improve the way that they deal with students, as the Competition and Markets Authority expresses concern about the slow pace of sector-wide compliance with consumer law.

In its first review of consumer law compliance in UK higher education, the CMA says that too many institutions were still using terms that gave them wide discretion to vary tuition fees or change courses, were not clear enough about additional course costs, or prevented students from progressing and graduating if they owed non-academic debts.

Three institutions – Bucks New University, the University of Buckingham, and Birkbeck, University of London – have agreed undertakings with the CMA requiring them to make improvements.

But the CMA says that it has so far reviewed information provided to students by only a sample of institutions, so the concerns that it had identified “may be occurring more widely”.

The watchdog, which began work in higher education in 2014, warns that universities that fail to comply with consumer law could face criminal prosecution.

A survey of 66 providers, conducted by the CMA, found that all but one had made changes to the information that they provide to prospective students as a result of guidance from the CMA. A further 77 per cent had amended the information that they provided to current students, while 85 per cent had changed their practices, policies, rules or regulations.

But the CMA says that swifter progress is needed.

“We are concerned by how long it is taking some providers to complete their reviews and implement the necessary changes, where necessary,” the report says. “We would urge providers to ensure these changes are finalised and implemented as a matter of urgency, given it is now over a year since the CMA’s 2015 higher education advice was published and we are approaching the start of the new academic year.”

The undertakings announced alongside the report require universities to remove terms that prevents students from progressing or graduate if they owe non-academic debts (Bucks New and Buckingham); improve information around additional course costs (Buckingham); amend terms that allow wide variation in tuition fees (Birkbeck and Buckingham); and ensure that the complaints process does not deter students from raising or pursuing complaints (Birkbeck and Bucks New).

Nisha Arora, the CMA’s senior director of consumer issues, welcomed the three universities’ “constructive engagement”.

“The CMA expects all higher education providers to comply with consumer protection law and has drawn the findings of its compliance review to their attention,” she said. “The CMA is continuing to look at issues relating to other providers and should we be made aware of other concerns, this could result in further action, either by the CMA, other enforcers, or sector regulators.”

Rebecca Bunting, vice-chancellor of Bucks New, said that the process had allowed it “to ensure our policies and procedures are fully up to date and in compliance with the relevant legislation”.

A Buckingham spokeswoman said that the information it provided to students was “now fully consistent with CMA guidance”. Procedures had “already been revised” prior to the CMA’s investigation, but “had not been published on our website”.

A Birkbeck spokeswoman said that the college was “committed to providing clear and accurate information for applicants and students” and had been “happy to work constructively with the CMA to give even greater clarity”.

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Reader's comments (1)

While there is a need to ensure that students are not cheated or misled, the CMA , and the reaction to its statements, is removing the ability of lecturers to change degree content to reflect changes in the subject areas. The result is that degree content has to be specified clearly a year before a student joins and has to be in place for the three or four years of the degree. As the specification includes final year content, this is five years to delivery. There needs to be a balance between providing accurate information for choices to be made, and providing the best, most relevant, content to students at the point of delivery. Education is not a pre-packaged product, bought off the shelf, despite this Government's wishes and the statements of the CMA. Education needs to be real, relevant and contemporary to benefit students. Allowing change is essential for motivating students and lecturers. Bring it back.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Home secretary says government will support 'best' universities

Man handing microphone to audience member

Academic attainment of disadvantaged students can be improved if they can decide how they are assessed, study claims

Woman drinking tea from saucer

Plugging a multibillion-pound deficit exacerbated by June’s poll result may require ‘drastic measures’, analysts have warned

Italy's gold medallist

New measures to ensure universities are ‘not penalised’ for taking poorer students also outlined for next stage of TEF

Classroom, school

Higher education institutions can and should do more to influence education at a secondary school level, says Edward Peck