Brian Cox: new freeze in research funding would be ‘dire’ for UK science

Physicist warns that the UK’s high scientific output is based on investment made ‘decades’ ago

September 16, 2015

Another freeze in research funding over the next five years would be “dire” for UK science, according to Brian Cox.

The University of Manchester physicist and TV presenter was speaking to MPs as the sector braces itself for the government spending review in November.

In the last review in 2010, the research budget was held flat in cash terms – which equated to about a 10 per cent real cut.

The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills has been ordered to model cuts of up to 40 per cent for the review, which will set out the government’s spending plans for the next five years.

“If there’s another flat cash settlement, then realistically, it’s dire,” Professor Cox told the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee yesterday afternoon.

“That’s not my opinion, it seems to be the opinion unanimously of the research councils,” he said.

In particular he focused on the consequences for the Science and Technology Facilities Council, for which another five years of flat cash would be an “absolute disaster”.

“Unless there’s something like a 10 per cent increase in its budget, essentially it will either pull out of major areas of research or will see a collapse in the funding of younger researchers. And that’s extremely important,” Professor Cox told MPs.

“That’s very serious and I get the sense that the same problems exist across all research councils.”

Although he acknowledged that the UK still “just about” had a world-class research base, he said that good current performance was based on previous investments. “We’re reaping the rewards of decisions made decades ago,” Professor Cox said.

Scientific facilities were currently lying unused, so small increases in funding would increase productivity significantly.

According to the campaign group Science is Vital, another five years of flat cash would mean that by 2020, relative to GDP, research funding would have been cut by nearly 25 per cent.

david.matthews@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Monster behind man at desk

Despite all that’s been done to improve doctoral study, horror stories keep coming. Here three students relate PhD nightmares while two academics advise on how to ensure a successful supervision

opinion illustration

Eliminating cheating services, even if it were possible, would do nothing to address students’ and universities’ lack of interest in learning, says Stuart Macdonald

Female professor

New data show proportion of professors who are women has declined at some institutions

Sir Christopher Snowden, former Universities UK president, attacks ratings in wake of Southampton’s bronze award

Reflection of man in cracked mirror

To defend the values of reason from political attack we need to be more discriminating about the claims made in its name, says John Hendry