Brexit campaigners ‘divided on international students’

Science Council debate highlights differences in Leave camp about whether more international students are needed in the UK

April 16, 2016
Cows in a field with a signpost saying 'better off out of the European Union'
Source: Alamy

Uncertainty over the policy towards international students in the event of a Brexit emerged as a key point of contention among those wanting the UK to leave the European Union during a debate held by the Science Council.

Jamie Martin, a science policy adviser for Scientists for Britain, argued that opportunities to study in the UK should be equal between EU and non-EU students.

“I can’t understand from a scientific perspective, let alone from a moral perspective, why we think it’s right that a Ghanaian student has less immigration rights and less rights to subsidised fees than an Italian student,” he said, accusing campaigners wanting to stay in the EU of having a “1950s worldview”.

He added that it would “hold the country back 30 or 40 years” if they continued to make it difficult for students from outside the EU to study and collaborate in the UK.

However, another pro-Brexit speaker, Stephen Bush, emeritus professor of process manufacture and polymer engineering at the University of Manchester, took a more conservative attitude, saying that Britain is “doing quite enough” to bring international students to UK universities.

Quoting the Higher Education Statistics Agency, he said that the UK has the highest proportion of foreign full-time postgraduate students of any English-speaking country, at around 60 per cent.

“What we’re lacking is enough British students doing postgraduate degrees,” he said.

The divisions arose at a panel debate organised by the Science Council to discuss the impact that a break with the EU would have on science and higher education.

On the pro-EU side, Julian Huppert, the former Liberal Democrat MP and an academic fellow in computational biology at Clare College, Cambridge, noted that leaving the union would make it harder for European students to study in the UK.

“We shouldn’t shoot ourselves in one foot to help another foot. What we want to do is make it easier for students from anywhere in the world to come here,” he said.

Janet Beer, vice-chancellor of University of Liverpool and vice-president of Universities UK, took a similar stance, saying the UK should be “much more generous in offering post-study work opportunities” for international postgraduates, highlighting this issue as a reason why the levels of Indian students have halved in the UK.

She added: “Voluntarily cutting ourselves off from Europe would undermine our position as a global leader in science and innovation and limit international opportunities for UK students.”

A poll of the audience at the debate showed 77 per cent in favour of remaining in the EU, 18 per cent undecided, and 5 per cent voting to leave.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Worried man wiping forehead
Two academics explain how to beat some of the typical anxieties associated with a doctoral degree
A group of flamingos and a Marabou stork

A right-wing philosopher in Texas tells John Gill how a minority of students can shut down debates and intimidate lecturers – and why he backs Trump

A face made of numbers looks over a university campus

From personalising tuition to performance management, the use of data is increasingly driving how institutions operate

students use laptops

Researchers say students who use computers score half a grade lower than those who write notes

As the country succeeds in attracting even more students from overseas, a mixture of demographics, ‘soft power’ concerns and local politics help explain its policy