Brazil boosts online study

December 24, 2004

Brazil plans a massive expansion of distance learning in 2005 to address a teacher shortage and make education more accessible.

The Government plans to spend R$20 million (£2.6 million) on distance-learning programmes in 2005, an increase of nearly 50 per cent on 2004.

Selma Leite, president of UniRede, a virtual network of 70 public universities and higher education institutions, welcomed the change.

According to ministry figures, Brazil has a deficit of 235,000 teachers in mathematics, physics, chemistry and biology.

Of 51 higher education courses offered through distance learning and authorised by the Education Ministry, 45 are aimed at training or further developing teachers' qualifications.

Only 9 per cent of Brazilians between 18 and 24 enter higher education, compared with 30 per cent in Argentina and Chile.

Lack of investment has created a crisis in state higher education. Student numbers at the Federal University in Par state, for example, have risen from 14,000 to 36,000 in ten years but the number of teachers has remained the same.

Distance learning is already being developed. The Faculty for Technology and Science in Salvador, in the north east, has been authorised to offer 43,500 distance-learning places.

The Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, in Minais Gerais state, is to offer distance-learning courses. And distance-learning students with Brazil's capital market institute (Ibmec) in Sao Paulo have tripled since 2003.

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October