Biometric scanners used to keep tabs on overseas students

Sunderland and Ulster introduce fingerprinting systems

October 17, 2013

Source: Getty

Where’s the trust? NUS criticises ‘incredibly unwelcoming’ measures

Universities are fingerprinting international students to check they are attending lectures, but not their UK counterparts, it has emerged.

The universities of Sunderland and Ulster have installed biometric monitoring systems on satellite campuses not used by British students, a move condemned by the National Union of Students.

Earlier this month, Sunderland brought in fingerprint-scanning devices for lectures on its London campus, replacing traditional paper registers. Ruth Davison, student relations and compliance manager at Sunderland, said the system had been installed because the site was “entirely international” and the Home Office required that all attendance be monitored.

Under a swipe pass system, students could sign each other in and passes could even be lost, she said. And time taken signing a physical register during lectures “has a huge impact on teaching and learning”.

The fingerprint data would be destroyed after students left the university, Ms Davison added. She also said that the students were “really comfortable” about fingerprinting and the London campus’ student council was happy with the system.

But Carl Taylor, president of Sunderland’s students’ union, said that as far as he was aware, the main union had not been informed.

He said he needed more information, but his “initial instinct” was that international students would see this as a “limitation of freedom”.

Ms Davison said that Sunderland had decided to consult only the students affected by the system.

Ulster introduced fingerprint scanners to its London and Birmingham campuses in January. A university spokesman said it had done so to comply with the government’s attendance monitoring requirements.

Daniel Stevens, international students’ officer at the NUS, attacked the systems as “incredibly unwelcoming” measures that appear to “unfairly target one group”.

He added: “It is appalling that certain institutions have required physical checks of any quantity and have discriminated against international students when implementing monitoring procedures.”

There has been confusion over what checks are necessary to make sure overseas students are in the UK to study rather than work. In February, the UK Border Agency, which was subsequently scrapped, clarified that universities “do not necessarily need to consider…physical checks” such as fingerprinting, nor do overseas students require more regular checks than their domestic peers.

Last year, Newcastle University considered introducing biometric checks but decided against them after a student union vote.

david.matthews@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

PhD Scholar in Medicine

University Of Queensland

Manager, Research Systems and Performance

Auckland University Of Technology

Lecturer in Aboriginal Allied Health

University Of South Australia

Lecturer, School of Nursing & Midwifery

Western Sydney University

College General Manager, SHE

La Trobe University
See all jobs

Most Viewed

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi