Big Brother professor ‘unfairly dismissed’

Tribunal rules Manchester wrongly sacked high-profile psychologist Geoff Beattie

August 20, 2014

Source: Edge Hill University

A professor best known as the resident psychologist on reality show Big Brother was unfairly sacked by the University of Manchester over his outside work, a tribunal has ruled.

Geoff Beattie, who was professor of psychology at Manchester between 1994 and 2012, came to prominence for his work analysing the body language of contestants on the show when it was broadcast on Channel 4.

Beattie, who appeared on Big Brother in its first 10 series, also worked on other TV programmes, including relationship advice programmes Life’s Too Short, Family SOS and Dump Your Mates in Four Days, and was on-screen psychologist for ITV’s paranormal show featuring celebrities, titled Ghosthunting With

The Belfast-born academic, who is also an expert in consumer behaviour, also conducted research for well-known brands Direct Line and Nivea.

However, he was dismissed for gross misconduct from Manchester in November 2012 after it was alleged that he had failed to disclose the full extent of his outside work.

It was also claimed his work went beyond broadcasting related activities into private consultancy and he had failed to account to the university for the resources he had used in doing it, particularly time spent by his research assistants. 

Professor Beattie, who is now professor of psychology at Edge Hill University, disputed the charge and an employment tribunal has now ruled in his favour.

In a decision published on 20 August, it notes the university generally encouraged outside work on the part of its academic staff and had used Professor Beattie’s media profile to attract students. 

“While it was reasonable to conclude that his actions had been in breach of the relevant policies, it was unfair to dismiss him for what was a first disciplinary offence,” it said.

“He had not acted dishonestly or deliberately breached the policies and his long service and excellent record with the university should have been given greater weight,” it added.

Potential damages related to the unfair dismissal are due to be decided at a further hearing.

jack.grove@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (1)

For some reason Brian Cox's name popped into my head when I was reading this article.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Monster behind man at desk

Despite all that’s been done to improve doctoral study, horror stories keep coming. Here three students relate PhD nightmares while two academics advise on how to ensure a successful supervision

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride

Sir Christopher Snowden, former Universities UK president, attacks ratings in wake of Southampton’s bronze award

Reflection of man in cracked mirror

To defend the values of reason from political attack we need to be more discriminating about the claims made in its name, says John Hendry

But the highest value UK spin-off companies mainly come from research-intensive universities, latest figures show