Australian higher education 'critical' to diplomacy and trade

Universities Australia urges government to recognise sector's role in foreign policy review

March 20, 2017
Melbourne
Melbourne central business district and docks

Higher education can boost Australia’s diplomatic, trade and investment efforts overseas, the umbrella body for the nation’s universities advises in its submission to a new foreign policy strategy.

Universities Australia also says in its submission to the government’s foreign policy White Paper that nations such as China and Malaysia have been investing in their higher education systems as a way of retaining home students and attracting overseas students, meaning Australia “cannot be complacent”.

The key to the government ensuring Australian universities remain attractive is “higher education and research policy stability and adequate public investment”, says UA.

“Not only is the provision of education to international students an industry in its own right, international education and research provided by our universities is a critical pillar that supports Australia’s diplomatic, trade and investment effort,” it adds.

And UA continues: “International education is Australia’s third largest export industry and the largest services export, contributing A$21.8 billion (£13.6 billion) to the Australian economy in 2016. Of this, international education provided by our universities contributed approximately 67 per cent.”

Among the organisation’s recommendations are that a “whole-of-government brand” be developed for Australia education, and that “consistent and appropriate visa settings” be applied to maintain a “comparative advantage for students and academic staff”.

On competition, UA warns: "Consideration must also be given to the fact that traditional market countries such as China and Malaysia have been investing heavily in their respective education systems – both as a means of retaining students within the system as well as attracting new overseas student markets.

“So while Australia has enjoyed significant ongoing success in attracting international students over the past 10 years, we cannot be complacent. Whole-of-government support and policy flexibility will be central to our ongoing success.”

Belinda Robinson, UA chief executive, said: “With A$3.5 billion in higher education cuts still reflected in the budget, and global competition for international students intensifying, Australia’s continued success is in the balance.

“Universities in our region are investing heavily in their own systems – China is building a university every week – and countries all over the world are setting ambitious international education targets. 

“If we want to continue to be in the top three destinations for international students, then our policy, regulatory and funding settings must support that aim.” 

john.morgan@timeshighereducation.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Monster behind man at desk

Despite all that’s been done to improve doctoral study, horror stories keep coming. Here three students relate PhD nightmares while two academics advise on how to ensure a successful supervision

Sir Christopher Snowden, former Universities UK president, attacks ratings in wake of Southampton’s bronze award

opinion illustration

Eliminating cheating services, even if it were possible, would do nothing to address students’ and universities’ lack of interest in learning, says Stuart Macdonald

Female professor

New data show proportion of professors who are women has declined at some institutions

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride