AHRC recruitment ‘not connected’ to Big Society resignations

The Arts and Humanities Research Council has insisted that the appointment of more than 200 new members to its peer review college is unrelated to a spate of resignations last year.

April 22, 2012

The AHRC announced recently that it had made around 220 new appointments to its peer review college, from which most of the reviewers for AHRC funding applications are drawn.

The recruitment drive, which began last November, followed in the wake of a controversy last summer over the AHRC delivery plan. This plan, published at the end of 2010, made several references to how the council’s Connected Communities programme would contribute to Prime Minister David Cameron’s Big Society agenda.

More than 4,000 academics and 30 learned societies signed a petition calling for the references to be expunged. When the research council refused, 52 members of its peer review college resigned.

However, a spokesman for the AHRC said the recruitment drive, which attracted more than 300 applications, was planned before the resignations and was unconnected to them. Its aim had been to appoint extra reviewers with expertise in knowledge exchange and the AHRC’s priority areas, which include connected communities, as well as design, heritage and modern languages.

The spokesman said that the new members, who are affiliated to 70 different institutions across the UK, took numbers at the peer review college to more than 1,500.

Mark Llewellyn, the AHRC’s director of research, said: “As a former member of the peer review college myself, I know how informative, useful and instructive the process of reviewing and serving on panels can be.”

But Thom Brooks, a reader in political and legal philosophy at Newcastle University, said: “Mention the AHRC to many colleagues now and the row over the Big Society – which is now before the parliamentary ombudsman – inevitably arises.

“This recent announcement is perhaps an attempt to move forward from this unfortunate decision. I remain firmly supportive of the AHRC and the excellent work it continues to do for the arts and humanities. Nevertheless, many of the AHRC’s firm supporters that I know recognise that the inclusion of the Big Society was a needless mistake that should be corrected without further delay.”

paul.jump@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Worried man wiping forehead
Two academics explain how to beat some of the typical anxieties associated with a doctoral degree

Felipe Fernández-Armesto takes issue with a claim that the EU has been playing the sovereignty card in Brexit negotiations

A group of flamingos and a Marabou stork

A right-wing philosopher in Texas tells John Gill how a minority of students can shut down debates and intimidate lecturers – and why he backs Trump

A face made of numbers looks over a university campus

From personalising tuition to performance management, the use of data is increasingly driving how institutions operate

Kenny Dalglish

Agnes Bäker and Amanda Goodall have found that academics who are happiest at work have a head of department who is a distinguished researcher. How can such people be encouraged into management?