Academic freedom ‘doesn’t really exist’

“Right-on” lecturers and student campaigns cited as among the reasons, Commons event hears

November 12, 2013

“Quietude”, self-censorship and “right-on” lecturers were among the threats to “academic freedom in illiberal times” identified in a debate organised by online magazine spiked (in association with Academics for Academic Freedom and Times Higher Education) at the House of Commons on 11 November.

Introducing the event, chair Joanna Williams, lecturer in higher education and academic practice at the University of Kent, noted how “students are quick to ban everything from pop songs to ‘lads’ mags”. Along with speech codes and no-platform policies, this had led to a notable “trend for academics to self-censor”.

Bill Rammell, vice-chancellor of the University of Bedfordshire, declared himself an instinctive enemy of boycotts, blanket bans and no-platform policies, since “open democratic debate is the best way of marginalising violent extremism”.

Yet for Dennis Hayes, professor of education at the University of Derby, “academic freedom doesn’t really exist today, since we have lost the idea of free speech as a foundational value…We don’t even know what our own opinions mean if they are not tested…Quietude now dominates the academy – I want universities more like bags of ferrets, as they used to be.”

Terence Kealey, vice-chancellor of the University of Buckingham, argued that “it is important that universities have different governance structures, as this is likely to lead to greater plurality of thought”.

Certain forms of self-censorship were probably inevitable, given that “researchers tend to produce the data which funders want, so they can gain the next grant”, but plurality would at least create a more balanced environment through “different forms of censorship in different places”.

Munira Mirza, London’s deputy mayor for education and culture, spoke of “a general rush to curtail what people can say”, which led to the risk of “freezing out controversial views on racial genetics or environmentalism”.

She was opposed to “a culture where some ideas are just too offensive”, noting how it was now common to see “orchestrated campaigns” in response to someone at a freshers’ fair wearing a T-shirt some religious students found offensive.

Yet in reality, Ms Mirza went on, “young people are used to being insulted and offended, and know how to cope with it”.

Today’s universities, however, were often about “training individuals to feel vulnerable and sorry for themselves”, as in the case of a “right-on” tutor at Oxford who had said to her: “As a woman, do you find Shakespeare offensive?”

matthew.reisz@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham