A 'right' or wrong

September 8, 2000

Sarah Fitzpatrick argued that because not everyone is guaranteed a place at university, regardless of ability, there is no longer a "right". By this bizarre logic, because a doctor does not operate on all people regardless of whether they are ill or healthy should we sacrifice the belief in the "right" to free healthcare?

The fact is that there are thousands of working-class youngsters with the latent ability to go to university, but they forfeit their "right" either through lack of parental support, failures of the education system or simply because they cannot afford to go.

She perversely remarks that it is "in the interests of fairness" to scrap the cap on tuition fees, which is already damaging access.

Fitzpatrick finally reels out that old chestnut that the money would be better spent on pensioners, hospitals or schools than on higher education and students - they are not mutually exclusive.

Neil Foster Union of Students University of Sheffield

Please login or register to read this article

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments