1% offer ‘endangers’ national pay bargaining

Below-inflation rise could prompt richer institutions to offer enhanced local deals, expert warns

February 27, 2014

National pay bargaining is “in danger of disintegrating” if employers seek to push through a sixth successive below-inflation pay rise next month, an industrial relations expert has warned.

Pay negotiations for 2014-15 are due to start next month amid continuing industrial unrest over this year’s 1 per cent pay offer, with University and College Union members threatening to boycott marking from 28 April if employers do not improve the deal.

But staff at cash-rich institutions might look to break away from the UK-wide negotiations to agree better local deals if universities do not substantially improve on this year’s offer, according to Roger Seifert, professor of industrial relations at the University of Wolverhampton.

“We are in a period where the desire to preserve the system is only just in the balance,” said Professor Seifert.

“The system is threatened and is in danger of disintegrating,” he added.

Most universities want to keep the current set-up because it stops institutions competing against each other on wages; as unions also wish to preserve national bargaining, this might prompt an improved offer for next year, Professor Seifert predicted.

No university has left national pay bargaining since £9,000 tuition fees were introduced in 2012, despite predictions that institutions able to expand their student numbers might seek to offer higher locally agreed pay.

Last year, union members at the University of Exeter rejected an offer to increase pay by 1 per cent above any nationally agreed deal if they left national pay bargaining.

However, some universities have sought to pay their staff more by altering salary packages while remaining within the UK-wide framework for pay negotiations.

The London School of Economics has agreed to pay higher minimum salaries to its full-time academic staff as part of a new academic career structure introduced this year, although they will no longer receive automatic annual increments.

A spokesman for the Universities and Colleges Employers Association said that collective bargaining had adapted to major sector changes but had been “remarkably successful in delivering the stability and sustainability in higher education pay for more than two decades”.

“There have always been countervailing pressures for and against collective pay negotiations; these are bound to intensify in an environment of austerity and pay restraint,” he added.

jack.grove@tsleducation.com

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

Laurel and Hardy sawing a plank of wood

Working with other academics can be tricky so follow some key rules, say Kevin O'Gorman and Robert MacIntosh

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham