UCU best bar none

June 23, 2016

Those on the University and College Union equality committee who have decided to bar people who do not have a “protected characteristic” from attending its equality conference ought to read the law (“UCU reps ‘need protected characteristic’ to attend equality event”, News, 4 June).

It appears that those who are responsible for the decision are under the impression that the protected characteristic of “sexual orientation” applies only to those who are gay/lesbian, that “sex” applies only to the female sex, and that “race” applies only to those who are black, Asian, or from an ethnic minority. In fact, everyone has a protected characteristic, whether they “declare it” or not.

For example, the protected characteristic of “sex” applies to both sexes – male and female. The Equality Act 2010 states: “11. Sex

In relation to the protected characteristic of sex –

(a) a reference to a person who has a particular protected characteristic is a reference to a man or a woman” (emphasis added).

On the protected characteristic of “race”: “9. Race

(1) Race includes –

(a) colour;

(b) nationality;

(c) ethnic or national origins” (emphasis added).

That is, the protected characteristic of “race” does not apply only to those who are black, from an ethnic minority, or Asian, it applies to all colours and nationalities.

On the protected characteristic of “sexual orientation”:

“12. Sexual orientation

(1) Sexual orientation means a person’s sexual orientation towards –

(a) persons of the same sex,

(b) persons of the opposite sex, or (c) persons of either sex” (emphasis added).

That is, the protected characteristic of “sexual orientation” does not apply only to those who are gay or lesbian, it applies to all sexual orientations.

It is just as much an offence to discriminate against a person because they are male, white or heterosexual as it is to discriminate against them because they are female, from an ethnic minority, gay or transgender.

The UCU is not barring people who are white, male or heterosexual because they lack the “protected characteristic”; it is barring them in breach of the protected characteristic.

I would submit, therefore, that the UCU itself is acting in breach of the Equality Act 2010, and is leaving itself open to litigation.

Ray Hoppkrofft
West Yorkshire


Send to

Letters should be sent to: THE.Letters@tesglobal.com
Letters for publication in Times Higher Education should arrive by 9am Monday.
View terms and conditions.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Worried man wiping forehead
Two academics explain how to beat some of the typical anxieties associated with a doctoral degree

Felipe Fernández-Armesto takes issue with a claim that the EU has been playing the sovereignty card in Brexit negotiations

Female professor

New data show proportion of professors who are women has declined at some institutions

John McEnroe arguing with umpire. Tennis

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman explain how to negotiate your annual performance and development review

Man throwing axes

UCU attacks plans to cut 171 posts, but university denies Brexit 'the reason'