The headline for the article on universities sponsoring schools overstates the difference between the vice-chancellors from the University of Oxford and Nottingham Trent University (“Oxford’s vice-chancellor is wrong: universities should not see running schools as ‘a distraction’”, 20 October).
Both have explained how universities can help with attainment; both universities have strong ties to local schools. What is at dispute is whether a third of university tuition funding should be tied to a university sponsoring a “successful” school. There is no evidence that university sponsorship is a golden bullet for school improvement; universities have sponsored some converter academies that remain inadequate or requiring improvement. It might work for universities in large cities to sponsor a school; there are particular issues for Oxford such that it would be mad to take on a school.
Register to continue
Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.
Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:
- Sign up for the editor's highlights
- Receive World University Rankings news first
- Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
- Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?Sign in now