Read and heed the heels

July 9, 2015

I would like to commend Times Higher Education for the attention paid to shoes in recent issues, with articles that brilliantly discuss footwear and its history in relation to power and femininity (“Hot shoe shuffle”, Culture, 18 June; “Don’t tread on me”, Opinion, 2 July).

This reminded me of a recent conversation I had with a male university leader who admitted to not understanding anything about shoes (a “mystery” to him) or why women would find them interesting. Perhaps serious issues such as gender inequality and pay gaps would have been tackled and solved much earlier had male vice-chancellors had a modicum of understanding of how the presentation of self (clothes and shoes) affects the way women think of themselves and are perceived in academia.

Anna Notaro
Duncan of Jordanstone College of Art and Design
University of Dundee
Twitter: @notanna1

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (29 June 2017)

Academics who think they can do the work of professional staff better than professional staff themselves are not showing the kind of respect they expect from others

As the pay of BBC on-air talent is revealed, one academic comes clean about his salary

Senior academics at Teesside University put at risk of redundancy as summer break gets under way

Capsized woman and boat

Early career academics can be left to sink or swim when navigating the choppy waters of learning scholarly writing. Helen Sword says a more formal, communal approach can help everyone, especially women

Thorns and butterflies

Conditions that undermine the notion of scholarly vocation – relentless work, ubiquitous bureaucracy – can cause academics acute distress and spur them to quit, says Ruth Barcan