Knowing what to expect

June 25, 2015

The article about how little help is on offer for those making their first formal review of a PhD candidate certainly struck a chord with me about the need for appropriate training before becoming an external examiner (“For doctoral examiners, it’s all about preparation”, News, 18 June).

I remember the first time I was an external examiner for a PhD, never having undertaken any kind of training or mentoring for the role. At the preliminary meeting with the internal examiner at the candidate’s institution, I was asked what I thought of the thesis. I said that I thought it was a fail because it was so poor. After a shocked silence, the internal examiner said, “But you don’t understand. The mere fact that he has reached the viva means that he has passed. The only question is whether he passes with corrections or without.” Feeling intimidated by this statement, I agreed after the viva that the thesis should be passed, subject to various corrections. Some weeks later, I bumped into the candidate at a railway station. He thanked me profusely for letting him through with corrections, saying, “Both I and my supervisor were convinced that I was going to fail.”

Charles Oppenheim
Visiting professor in library and learning services
University of Northampton

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Monster behind man at desk

Despite all that’s been done to improve doctoral study, horror stories keep coming. Here three students relate PhD nightmares while two academics advise on how to ensure a successful supervision

Sir Christopher Snowden, former Universities UK president, attacks ratings in wake of Southampton’s bronze award

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride

Reflection of man in cracked mirror

To defend the values of reason from political attack we need to be more discriminating about the claims made in its name, says John Hendry

But the highest value UK spin-off companies mainly come from research-intensive universities, latest figures show