Is it relevant?

July 28, 2016

While there is a need to ensure that students are not cheated or misled, the Competition and Markets Authority and the reaction to its statements are removing the ability of lecturers to alter degree content to reflect changes in subject areas (“CMA tells universities to improve treatment of students”, 22 July). The result is that degree content has to be specified clearly a year before a student joins and has to be in place for the three or four years of the degree. As the specification includes final-year content, this is five years to delivery. There needs to be a balance between providing accurate information for choices to be made and providing the best, most relevant content to students at the point of delivery. Education is not a pre-packaged product, bought off the shelf, despite this government’s wishes and the statements of the CMA. Education needs to be real, relevant and contemporary to benefit students. Allowing change is essential for motivating students and lecturers. Bring it back.

Geoff Thwaites
Via timeshighereducation.com


Send to

Letters should be sent to: THE.Letters@tesglobal.com
Letters for publication in Times Higher Education should arrive by 9am Monday.
View terms and conditions.

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham