No cash to expand - Clarke to claw back Pounds 1.8 billion saving?

October 13, 1995

Higher education is unlikely to get extra funding for renewed expansion under a Conservative government, it emerged this week.

Billions of pounds, which Tory policy shapers think could be saved by reforming student grants and loans, is more likely to be snatched by the Treasury than ploughed back into higher education to fund growth and protect standards.

Sources close to Kenneth Clarke, Chancellor of the Exchequer, say he is looking with "enormous interest" at proposals from the Conservative National Policy Group on Higher Education for a privatised student loans scheme and the introduction of vouchers to pay fees.

The Chancellor's interest has alarmed some Conservative education pressure groups, meeting at the party's conference in Blackpool this week, who fear that savings of about Pounds 1.8 billion a year, which the policy group estimates would result from privatising the loans scheme, would be lost from the higher education budget.

Hopes of more resources to back resumed growth were further blighted by Eric Forth, the higher education minister, who told The THES this week that the Government was considering keeping the lid on expansion to protect standards.

Mr Forth said that a consultation paper to be published by early next year would question assumptions in the Tory policy group's paper that new money must be found to allow the sector to grow.

Tensions between Mr Forth's outlook, that of the policy group and higher education leaders surfaced at the party conference and at a meeting held in Oxford last week, which was attended by politicians, civil servants, vice chancellors and leading academics.

Clive Booth, vice chancellor of Oxford Brookes University, who attended the Oxford meeting, said if the Tory policy group wanted to sell its ideas for replacing grants and loans with a privatised loans scheme and introducing vouchers, it would have to show that a significant proportion of savings would flow back into the sector.

This view, which is being pressed by the Committee of Vice Chancellors and Principals, was shared by Demitri Coryton, chairman of the Conservative Party Education Association. At a fringe meeting staged by the Association for College Management at the party conference, Mr Coryton said he feared the policy group's ideas would not be adopted as a means to bolster higher education funding.

"It is a Treasury device designed to keep costs down, and it is doubtful it will increase resources for the sector," he said.

Gillian Shephard, Secretary of State for Education and Employment, was also quick to pour cold water on any calls for extra funding. Though she told the conference she wanted to see more people of "every age" going on to university, there was little reference to higher education in her speech. And in a press briefing afterwards, she warned that her "vigorous discussions with the Treasury" on funding did not mean any education leaders could "ask for the moon".

Bryan Davies, Labour's further and higher education spokesman, who attended the meeting in Oxford, said the Tory policy group's paper had pinpointed some areas on higher education funding on which there was a growing political consensus. These included the principle of student contributions to maintenance costs and the importance of generating extra money for funding expansion.

But he said the Labour Party would strongly oppose any move to make savings which did not result in more resources for the sector.

It was clear this week that even members of the Tory policy group were not expecting their proposals to lead to more money to back growth. One of them, Iain Crawford, of the London School of Economics, said: "In a democracy you have to make your case year on year for public expenditure. You cannot expect to have an element frozen for a particular sector. Looking at how savings can be made just for it to go back into higher education is just not on."

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns