Strikes loom as UCU urges rebuff

Union advocates rejection of pay offer and Prevent strategy implementation

May 28, 2015
University and College Union (UCU) flag hanging on statue
Source: Rex

Members of higher education’s largest trade union will be urged to reject a 1 per cent pay offer in a forthcoming ballot, raising the prospect of industrial action in universities.

University staff who are members of the University and College Union are to be consulted on the final offer for 2015-16 after delegates at the union’s congress in Glasgow backed the move.

The congress, which took place on 23-24 May, backed a motion by representatives from Leeds Beckett University that said “the UCU should call for members to reject the offer and vote yes for strike action and action short of a strike”.

Meanwhile, in another congress vote, delegates backed plans to ask staff to boycott the implementation of the government’s Prevent counter-terror strategy in higher education, despite warnings that non-cooperation may be unlawful.

The motion passed on pay said the UCU “must actively campaign amongst members to explain why the pay campaign is particularly important this year after many years of real-terms pay cuts”.

The motion was carried in a private session, from which the media were excluded. But it is believed that the vote was close and required a recount to establish the result.

The call for more explicit advice on the pay offer follows criticism from some union activists that the UCU had shown weak leadership by failing to urge members to turn down pay offers in previous years.

Under the latest offer, pay for staff on the eight lowest points of the national pay spine would be increased by up to 2.65 per cent, which would mean that they are paid at least the living wage of £9.15 an hour in London and £7.85 in the rest of the UK.

The offer of 1 per cent for the rest of the pay spine – described as “disappointing” by the UCU – represents a small advance on the employers’ original proposal for 2015-16 of 0.9 per cent.

That proposal addressed “all aspects” of the pay claim by trade unions involved in higher education in spite of “the ever-increasingly challenging sector environment”, according to the Universities and Colleges Employers Association.

On Prevent, delegates voted overwhelmingly in favour of a motion to boycott the government’s initiative, which includes an aim to stop students from becoming radicalised in universities. The motion said that implementing Prevent will “force our members to spy on learners” and “be involved in the racist labelling of students”, principally Muslim students.

“We should all be reporting our students because they should all be becoming radical,” said Andrew Higginbotham, UCU branch chair at Kingston University.

However, the UCU leadership said it had taken legal advice, which stated that any boycott of Prevent might be illegal as it would constitute a failure to carry out reasonable instructions from an employer.

jack.grove@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

Laurel and Hardy sawing a plank of wood

Working with other academics can be tricky so follow some key rules, say Kevin O'Gorman and Robert MacIntosh

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham