What doctors need is a dose of fairness (1 of 2)

May 31, 2012

Chris Hackley is wrong when he suggests that we need a more humane and compassionate style of doctoral examination ("The kindness of strangers", 24 May). In fact, what we need is more respect for elementary principles of fairness.

Consider my case. I submitted a revised dissertation to the University of Cambridge with my supervisor's unequivocal support ("It will pass with flying colours," I was told). However, the newly appointed external examiner dismissed it as "complete nonsense" and prevailed upon the internal examiner to fail it. Since Cambridge allows only one revision, the failure was final. I had no access to examiners' reports, no access to the deliberations of the degree committee and no right of appeal.

Peter Butler, Basel, Switzerland

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Worried man wiping forehead
Two academics explain how to beat some of the typical anxieties associated with a doctoral degree

Felipe Fernández-Armesto takes issue with a claim that the EU has been playing the sovereignty card in Brexit negotiations

John McEnroe arguing with umpire. Tennis

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman explain how to negotiate your annual performance and development review

Man throwing axes

UCU attacks plans to cut 171 posts, but university denies Brexit 'the reason'

Cricket player and umpire exchanging bribe

The need to accommodate foreign students undermines domestic practices, says Lincoln Allison, spying parallels between UK universities and global sports bodies such as Fifa