As with every time new "world rankings" are published, I find myself scratching my head.
Am I missing something? Card-carrying professional scientist that I am, it still completely eludes me how institutions such as the Massachusetts Institute of Technology or the California Institute of Technology (or even our own Imperial College London), which, as far as I know, have absolutely no arts faculties of any size, shape or form, can possibly be considered superior "universities" to the likes of Oxford, Cambridge, the University of California, Berkeley or Yale.
Did someone change what a "university" is while I wasn't looking?
Robin Irvine, Royal Society research professor, Department of pharmacology, University of Cambridge.
Register to continue
Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.
Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:
- Sign up for the editor's highlights
- Receive World University Rankings news first
- Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
- Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?Sign in now