Trust issues

April 12, 2012

Of the 11 sub-themes in the mathematical sciences programme, mathematical physics was the only one ranked "excellent" in international standing by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council. Yet it is the only one to be cut because capacity "has grown such that continuing support at current levels risks undermining...other important areas" ("Juggling act earns EPSRC mixed reviews", 5 April).

The council's January 2009 data show spending on mathematical physics as 11.7 per cent of the programme; its April 2011 figures show it was 7.2 per cent. Even allowing for the fact that sub-themes that cross subject boundaries can receive funding from other programmes, the EPSRC figures still show a relative decline. Perhaps it will release the figures on which its claim is based?

A reduction in relative spend on mathematical physics was predicted by the EPSRC in 2009 on the grounds that "very blue sky projects can find it hard to demonstrate impact". This, I suspect, is the real reason for the cut.

The EPSRC says it wants to re-establish trust with the community. This is not a good start.

Michael Duff, Imperial College London

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Monster behind man at desk

Despite all that’s been done to improve doctoral study, horror stories keep coming. Here three students relate PhD nightmares while two academics advise on how to ensure a successful supervision

Female professor

New data show proportion of professors who are women has declined at some institutions

opinion illustration

Eliminating cheating services, even if it were possible, would do nothing to address students’ and universities’ lack of interest in learning, says Stuart Macdonald

John McEnroe arguing with umpire. Tennis

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman explain how to negotiate your annual performance and development review

Reflection of man in cracked mirror

To defend the values of reason from political attack we need to be more discriminating about the claims made in its name, says John Hendry